Developing a sustainable instructional leadership model: a six-year investigation of teachers in one urban middle school

ABSTRACT

We introduce a model of instructional leadership that can self-sustain curriculum-based reforms at school sites. Our model is based on a six year longitudinal study of science teachers who implemented an inquiry-based, technology-rich weather curriculum as part of their district-wide science education reform initiatives. This study defines a sustainable leadership model similar to the flying geese metaphor. In developing our leadership model, we used multiple data sources and synthesized three bodies of literature such as community of learners in social cognition theory, instructional leadership in education, and leadership in organizational psychology.

References

1. Fishman, B., & Krajcik, J. S. (2003). What does it mean to create sustainable science curriculum innovations? Science Education, 87(4), 564--573.
2. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942--1012.
3. Hart, A. W. (1995). Reconceiving school leadership: Emergent views. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 9--28.
4. Howe, A. C., & Stubbs, H. S. (2003). From science teacher to teacher leader: Leadership development as meaning making in a community of practice. Science Education, 87(2), 281--297.
5. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
6. Lee, H. -S., & Songer, N. B. (2003). Making authentic science accessible to students. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 923--948.
7. Messick, D. M., & Kramer, R. M. (2005). The psychology of leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Nahavandi, A. (2000). The art and science of leadership. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10. Silva, D. Y., Gimbert, B., & Nolan, J. (2000). Sliding the doors: Locking and unlocking possibilities for teacher leadership. Teachers College Record, 102(4), 779--804.
11. Smylie, M. A. (1995). New perspectives on teacher leadership. Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 3--7.
12. Songer, N. B. (1996). Exploring learning opportunities in coordinated network-enhanced classrooms: A case of Kids as Global Scientists. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(4), 297--327.
13. Songer, N. B., Lee, H. -S., & Kam, R. (2002). Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 128--150.
14. Songer, N. B. (in press a) BioKIDS: An Animated Conversation on the Development of Curricular Activity Structures for Inquiry Science. In R. Keith Sawyer, (Ed.) Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Songer, N. B. (in press b) Curriculum Focused Professional Development: Addressing the Barriers to Inquiry Pedagogy in Urban Classrooms. In R. Floden and E. Ashburn (Eds.) Leadership for Meaningful Learning Using Technology: What educators need to know and do. New York: Teachers' College Press.
16. Squire, K. D., MaKinster, J. G., Barnett, M., Luehmann, A. L., & Barab, S. L (2003). Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture. Science Education, 87(4), 468--489.
17. Westheimer, J. (1998). Among school teachers: Community, autonomy, and ideology in teachers' work. New York: Teachers College.
18. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.