skip to main content
10.1145/1148170.1148196acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Building bridges for web query classification

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 August 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Web query classification (QC) aims to classify Web users' queries, which are often short and ambiguous, into a set of target categories. QC has many applications including page ranking in Web search, targeted advertisement in response to queries, and personalization. In this paper, we present a novel approach for QC that outperforms the winning solution of the ACM KDDCUP 2005 competition, whose objective is to classify 800,000 real user queries. In our approach, we first build a bridging classifier on an intermediate taxonomy in an offline mode. This classifier is then used in an online mode to map user queries to the target categories via the above intermediate taxonomy. A major innovation is that by leveraging the similarity distribution over the intermediate taxonomy, we do not need to retrain a new classifier for each new set of target categories, and therefore the bridging classifier needs to be trained only once. In addition, we introduce category selection as a new method for narrowing down the scope of the intermediate taxonomy based on which we classify the queries. Category selection can improve both efficiency and effectiveness of the online classification. By combining our algorithm with the winning solution of KDDCUP 2005, we made an improvement by 9.7% and 3.8% in terms of precision and F1 respectively compared with the best results of KDDCUP 2005.

References

  1. D. Beeferman and A. Berger. Agglomerative clustering of a search engine query log. In KDD '00: Proceedings of the sixth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 407--416, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. M. Beitzel, E. C. Jensen, O. Frieder, D. Grossman, D. D. Lewis, A. Chowdhury, and A. Kolcz. Automatic web query classification using labeled and unlabeled training data. In SIGIR '05: Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 581--582, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. Gravano, V. Hatzivassiloglou, and R. Lichtenstein. Categorizing web queries according to geographical locality. In CIKM '03: Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 325--333, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. I.-H. Kang and G. Kim. Query type classification for web document retrieval. In SIGIR '03: Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval, pages 64--71, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Z. T. Kardkovács, D. Tikk, and Z. Bánsághi. The ferrety algorithm for the kdd cup 2005 problem. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 7(2):111--116, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Y. Li, Z. Zheng, and H. K. Dai. Kdd cup-2005 report: facing a great challenge. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 7(2):91--99, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. McCallum and K. Nigam. A comparison of event models for naive bayes text classication. In AAAI-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. G. Miller, R. Beckwith, C. Fellbaum, D. Gross, and K. Miller. Introduction to wordnet: an on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography, 3(4):23--244, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. F. Peng, D. Schuurmans, and S. Wang. Augmenting naive bayes classifiers with statistical language models. Inf. Retr., 7(3-4):317--345, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Platt. Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. In A. Smola, P. Bartlett, B. Scholkopf, and D. Schuurmans, editors, Advances in Large Margin Classifiers. MIT Press, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Shen, R. Pan, J.-T. Sun, J. J. Pan, K. Wu, J. Yin, and Q. Yang. Q2c@ust: our winning solution to query classification in kddcup 2005. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 7(2):100--110, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. C. van. Information Retrieval. Butterworths, London, second edition edition, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Vogel, S. Bickel, P. Haider, R. Schimpfky, P. Siemen, S. Bridges, and T. Scheffer. Classifying search engine queries using the web as background knowledge. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 7(2):117--122, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J.-R. Wen, J.-Y. Nie, and H.-J. Zhang. Query clustering using content words and user feedback. In SIGIR '01: Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 442--443, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Y. Yang and J. O. Pedersen. A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In ICML '97: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 412--420, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Building bridges for web query classification

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGIR '06: Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
            August 2006
            768 pages
            ISBN:1595933697
            DOI:10.1145/1148170

            Copyright © 2006 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 6 August 2006

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader