skip to main content
10.1145/1146598.1146687acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Federal agencies and the evolution of web governance

Published:21 May 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Over the last ten years federal agencies have undergone a fundamental transformation in the way they manage programs and internal administration, relations with Congress, and dealings with clients and citizens. Agencies now operate in sophisticated electronic environments of email, electronic documents and filings, Intranets, and Internets. This paper describes and analyzes the emergence of "web governance." Briefly, web governance is concerned with the control of content and design for agency websites. Here we focus on the processes by which web governance decisions are being made by individual federal agencies. We discuss preliminary information about how agencies are responding to Office of Management and Budget's new web content rules.

References

  1. Fountain, J. E. The Building of the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington DC, Brookings Institution Press, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Fountain, J. E. Information, Institutions and Governance: Advancing a Basic Social Science Research Program for Digital Government." Working Paper No. 03--004. Available at: http://www.umass.edu/digitalcenter/Research/working_papers/rwp03_004_fountain .pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Scott, J. Organizational knowledge and the intranet. Decision Support Systems, 23, 1 (1998), 3--17; Allcorn, S. Parallel virtual organizations: managing and working in the virtual workplace. Administration and Society 29 (1997), 412--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Scheepers, R. and Rose, J. Organizational intranets: cultivating information technology for the people by the people. In Subhasish Dasgupta (ed.) Managing Internet and Intranet Technologies in Organizations: Challenges and Opportunities, Hersey, PA., Idea Group Publishing, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Peristeras, V., Tsekos, T. and Tarabanis, K. Analyzing e-government as a paradigm shift, (paper delivered at the Annual Conference of the International Association of Schools and Institutes of Administration, June 2002, The United Nations Thessaloniki Centre for Public Service Professionalism).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Martin, D., Rouncefield, M. and Sommerville, I. Applying patterns of cooperative interaction to work (re)design: e-government and planning. Proceedings of the SIGHI conference on human factors. 2002. http://www.dirc.org.uk/publications/inproceedings/papers/65.pdf (10 Oct. 2005); Harvey, M., Palmer, J. and Speier, C. Implementing intra-organizational learning: a phased-model approach supported by intranet technology. European Management Journal 16, 3 (June, 1998), 341--354. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Fountain, Information, Institutions and Governance, p. 41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Goldsmith, S. and Eggers, W. Governing By Network. Washington, D.C., Brooking Institution Press, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. 1991. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice. Organization Science, 2,1 (February, 1991), 40--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Weick, K. The Social Psychology of Organizing. 2nd. ed. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Stacy, R. 1995. The science of complexity: an alternative Perspective for strategic change processes. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 6 (September, 1995), 477--495; Drazen, R. and Sandelands, L. Autogenesis: a perspective on the process of organizing. Organization Science, 3,2 (May, 1992), 230--249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hayek, F. Individualism and the Economic Order. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1948.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Stacy, op.cit, p. 479.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gil-Garcia, J. R. and Martinez-Moyano, I. J. Exploring E-Government Evolution: The Influence of Systems of Rules on Organizational Action." NCDG Working Paper No. 05--001. Available at: http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/digitalcenter/Research/working_papers/gil-garci_a wp05-001.pdf (February 26, 2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mahler, J. and Regan, P. M. The Evolution of web governance in the federal government. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2, 1 (January, 2006),Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Mahler, J. and Regan, P. M. Crafting the message: controlling the content of agency websites. Government Information Quarterly, (forthcoming); Mahler, J. and Regan, P. M. Agency internets and changing dynamics of congressional oversight. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 7&8 (2005), 553--565.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Lawrence, P. and Lorsch. J. Organization and Environment. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. The External Control of Organizations. New York, Harper & Row, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Perrow, C. Complex Organizations. New York, Random House, 1986; Montjoy, R. and OToole, L. Toward a theory of policy implementation: an organizational perspective. Public Administration Review, (September/October, 1979): 465--476.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. West, D. M. State and federal e-government in the United States, 2003. http://www.insidepolitics.org/egovt03us.html (25 Oct 2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. West, D. M. State and federal e-government in the United States, 2005. http://www.insidepolitics.org/egovt05us.pdf (25 Oct., 2005)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mahler, J. and Regan, P. M. Crafting the message.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Mahler, J. and Regan, P. M. Crafting the message.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahler, J. and Regan, P. M. Crafting the message.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Federal agencies and the evolution of web governance
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              dg.o '06: Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Digital government research
              May 2006
              526 pages

              Publisher

              Digital Government Society of North America

              Publication History

              • Published: 21 May 2006

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              dg.o '06 Paper Acceptance Rate20of58submissions,34%Overall Acceptance Rate150of271submissions,55%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader