ABSTRACT
Over the last ten years federal agencies have undergone a fundamental transformation in the way they manage programs and internal administration, relations with Congress, and dealings with clients and citizens. Agencies now operate in sophisticated electronic environments of email, electronic documents and filings, Intranets, and Internets. This paper describes and analyzes the emergence of "web governance." Briefly, web governance is concerned with the control of content and design for agency websites. Here we focus on the processes by which web governance decisions are being made by individual federal agencies. We discuss preliminary information about how agencies are responding to Office of Management and Budget's new web content rules.
- Fountain, J. E. The Building of the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington DC, Brookings Institution Press, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fountain, J. E. Information, Institutions and Governance: Advancing a Basic Social Science Research Program for Digital Government." Working Paper No. 03--004. Available at: http://www.umass.edu/digitalcenter/Research/working_papers/rwp03_004_fountain .pdfGoogle Scholar
- Scott, J. Organizational knowledge and the intranet. Decision Support Systems, 23, 1 (1998), 3--17; Allcorn, S. Parallel virtual organizations: managing and working in the virtual workplace. Administration and Society 29 (1997), 412--39. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scheepers, R. and Rose, J. Organizational intranets: cultivating information technology for the people by the people. In Subhasish Dasgupta (ed.) Managing Internet and Intranet Technologies in Organizations: Challenges and Opportunities, Hersey, PA., Idea Group Publishing, 2002.Google Scholar
- Peristeras, V., Tsekos, T. and Tarabanis, K. Analyzing e-government as a paradigm shift, (paper delivered at the Annual Conference of the International Association of Schools and Institutes of Administration, June 2002, The United Nations Thessaloniki Centre for Public Service Professionalism).Google Scholar
- Martin, D., Rouncefield, M. and Sommerville, I. Applying patterns of cooperative interaction to work (re)design: e-government and planning. Proceedings of the SIGHI conference on human factors. 2002. http://www.dirc.org.uk/publications/inproceedings/papers/65.pdf (10 Oct. 2005); Harvey, M., Palmer, J. and Speier, C. Implementing intra-organizational learning: a phased-model approach supported by intranet technology. European Management Journal 16, 3 (June, 1998), 341--354. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fountain, Information, Institutions and Governance, p. 41.Google Scholar
- Goldsmith, S. and Eggers, W. Governing By Network. Washington, D.C., Brooking Institution Press, 2004.Google Scholar
- Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. 1991. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice. Organization Science, 2,1 (February, 1991), 40--57.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weick, K. The Social Psychology of Organizing. 2nd. ed. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1979.Google Scholar
- Stacy, R. 1995. The science of complexity: an alternative Perspective for strategic change processes. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 6 (September, 1995), 477--495; Drazen, R. and Sandelands, L. Autogenesis: a perspective on the process of organizing. Organization Science, 3,2 (May, 1992), 230--249.Google Scholar
- Hayek, F. Individualism and the Economic Order. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1948.Google Scholar
- Stacy, op.cit, p. 479.Google Scholar
- Gil-Garcia, J. R. and Martinez-Moyano, I. J. Exploring E-Government Evolution: The Influence of Systems of Rules on Organizational Action." NCDG Working Paper No. 05--001. Available at: http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/digitalcenter/Research/working_papers/gil-garci_a wp05-001.pdf (February 26, 2006).Google Scholar
- Mahler, J. and Regan, P. M. The Evolution of web governance in the federal government. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2, 1 (January, 2006),Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mahler, J. and Regan, P. M. Crafting the message: controlling the content of agency websites. Government Information Quarterly, (forthcoming); Mahler, J. and Regan, P. M. Agency internets and changing dynamics of congressional oversight. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 7&8 (2005), 553--565.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lawrence, P. and Lorsch. J. Organization and Environment. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
- Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. The External Control of Organizations. New York, Harper & Row, 1978.Google Scholar
- Perrow, C. Complex Organizations. New York, Random House, 1986; Montjoy, R. and OToole, L. Toward a theory of policy implementation: an organizational perspective. Public Administration Review, (September/October, 1979): 465--476.Google Scholar
- West, D. M. State and federal e-government in the United States, 2003. http://www.insidepolitics.org/egovt03us.html (25 Oct 2005).Google Scholar
- West, D. M. State and federal e-government in the United States, 2005. http://www.insidepolitics.org/egovt05us.pdf (25 Oct., 2005)Google Scholar
- Mahler, J. and Regan, P. M. Crafting the message.Google Scholar
- Mahler, J. and Regan, P. M. Crafting the message.Google Scholar
- Mahler, J. and Regan, P. M. Crafting the message.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Federal agencies and the evolution of web governance
Recommendations
The Janus-Faced Approach to Governance: A Mismatch Between Public Sector Reforms and Digital Government in Estonia
ICEGOV '18: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceWhile the Estonian digital government has received considerable attention in research and policy circles, there has been a lack of broader understanding of digital government initiatives in the context of public sector governance. By relying on ...
ICT for governance in combating corruption: the case of public e-procurement in Portugal
ICEGOV '14: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceLiterature has highlighted the potential of information and communication technology (ICT) in building new models of public governance that promote fairness and accountability, which are key requirements in the fight against corruption. In this context, ...
E-governance and governance: a case study of the assessment of the effects of integrated financial management system on good governance in two municipal councils in Kenya
ICEGOV '07: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governanceThe potential for ICT to positively contribute to good governance has been known for a long time and has been the subject of many articles and reports, but very little concrete empirical evidence of the effects of ICT on governance, and how these ...
Comments