skip to main content
10.1145/1143844.1143976acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Bayesian multi-population haplotype inference via a hierarchical dirichlet process mixture

Published:25 June 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Uncovering the haplotypes of single nucleotide polymorphisms and their population demography is essential for many biological and medical applications. Methods for haplotype inference developed thus far---including methods based on coalescence, finite and infinite mixtures, and maximal parsimony---ignore the underlying population structure in the genotype data. As noted by Pritchard (2001), different populations can share certain portion of their genetic ancestors, as well as have their own genetic components through migration and diversification. In this paper, we address the problem of multi-population haplotype inference. We capture cross-population structure using a nonparametric Bayesian prior known as the hierarchical Dirichlet process (HDP) (Teh et al., 2006), conjoining this prior with a recently developed Bayesian methodology for haplotype phasing known as DP-Haplotyper (Xing et al., 2004). We also develop an efficient sampling algorithm for the HDP based on a two-level nested Pólya urn scheme. We show that our model outperforms extant algorithms on both simulated and real biological data.

References

  1. Blackwell, D., & MacQueen, J. B. (1973). Ferguson distributions via Póólya urn schemes. Annals of Statistics, 1, 353--355.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Chakravarti, A. (2001). Single nucleotide polymorphisms: . . .to a future of genetic medicine. Nature, 409, 822--823.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Clark, A. (1990). Inferences of haplotypes from PCR-amplified samples of diploid populations. Mol. Biol. Evol, 7, 111--122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, A. (2003). Finding genes underlying risk of complex disease by linkage disequilibrium mapping. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 13, 296--302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Excoffier, L., & Slatkin, M. (1995). Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 12, 921--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferguson, T. S. (1973). A Bayesian analysis of some nonparametric problems. Annals of Statistics, 1, 209--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Group, T. I. S. M. W. (2001). A map of human genome sequence variation containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nature, 409, 928 -- 933.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hodge, S. E., Boehnke, M., & Spence, M. A. (1999). Loss of information due to ambiguous haplotyping of SNPs. Nat Genet, 21, 360--361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kimmel, G., & Shamir, R. (2004). Maximum likelihood resolution of multi-block genotypes. Proceedings of RECOMB 2004 (pp. 847--56). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Niu, T., Qin, S., Xu, X., & Liu, J. (2002). Bayesian haplotype inference for multiple linked single nucleotide polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics, 70, 157--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Patil, N., Berno, A. J., et al. (2001). Blocks of limited haplotype diversity revealed by high-resolution scanning of human chromosome 21. Science, 294, 1719--1723.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Pritchard, J. K. (2001). Are rare variants responsible for susceptibility to complex disease? Am J Hum Genet, 69, 124--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Rasmussen, C. E. (2000). The infinite Gaussian mixture model. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 12. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Stephens, M., & Scheet, P. (2005). Accounting for decay of linkage disequilibrium in haplotype inference and missing data imputation. American Journal of Human Genetics, 76, 449--462.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Stephens, M., Smith, N., & Donnelly, P. (2001). A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. American Journal of Human Genetics, 68, 978--989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Teh, Y., Jordan, M. I., Beal, M., & Blei, D. (2006). Hierarchical Dirichlet processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association (to appear).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Xing, E., Sharan, R., & Jordan, M. (2004). Bayesian haplotype inference via the Dirichlet process. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning. New York, NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Bayesian multi-population haplotype inference via a hierarchical dirichlet process mixture

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICML '06: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning
      June 2006
      1154 pages
      ISBN:1595933832
      DOI:10.1145/1143844

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 June 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      ICML '06 Paper Acceptance Rate140of548submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate140of548submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader