skip to main content
10.1145/1142405.1142446acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Interaction, usability and aesthetics: what influences users' preferences?

Published:26 June 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe an evaluation of two websites with the same content but different interface styles (traditional menu-based and interactive metaphors). A formative usability evaluation was carried out with heuristic assessment of aesthetics, and questionnaire assessment of aesthetics, content, information quality, usability and post-test memory. The study revealed that perception of information quality is affected by the interaction style implemented in the interface, in a manner resembling the halo effect in person perception. Implications for website design and evaluation are discussed.

References

  1. Bernier, M. J. Establishing the psychometric properties of a scale for evaluating quality in printed educational materials. Patient Education and Counselling 29,3 (1996), 283--299Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bloch, P. Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. Journal of Marketing 59 (1995) 16--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. De Angeli, A., Lynch, P., and Johnson G.I. Pleasure versus efficiency in user interfaces: Towards an involvement framework. In W. S. Green, & P. W. Jordan (Eds.), Pleasure with products: Beyond usability London: Taylor & Francis, (2002), 97--111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., and Walster, E. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24 (1972), 285--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hassenzahl, M. The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product In M. Blythe, C. Overbeeke, A. Monk, and P.C. Wright (Eds), Funology: From usability to enjoyment, (2003), 31--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Lavie, T., and Tractinsky, N. Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 60, 3 (2004) 269--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Lindegaard, G., and Dudek, C. What is this evasive beast we call user satisfaction? Interacting with Computers 15, 3 (2003), 429--452.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Meiners, M.L., and Sheposh, J.P. Beauty or brains: Which image for your mate? Personality and Social Psychology 3 (1977), 262--265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Monk, A. The product as a fixed effect fallacy. Human-Computer Interaction 19, 4 (2004), 371--375. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Monk, A., Wright, P., Haber, J., and Davenport, L. Improving Your Human-Computer Interface: A Practical Technique. Prentice Hall, London, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Norman, D.A. Beauty, goodness and usability: Introduction to the special section. Human-Computer Interaction 19, 4 (2004), 311--318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Norman, D.A. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Overbeeke, K.C., Djajadiningrat, J.P., Hummels, C.C. M., and Wensveen, S.A.G. Beauty in usability: forget about ease of use.In W. S. Green, & P. W. Jordan (Eds.), Pleasure with products: Beyond usability. London: Taylor & Francis, (2002), 97--111Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Reeves, B., and Nass, C. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television and New Media Like Real People and Places. CLSI/Cambridge University Press, Stanford CA/Cambridge, 1996 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Schaller, D.T., Allison-Bunnell, S., Chow, A., Marty, P., and Heo, M.,. To FlashFlash or not to FlashFlash? Usability and user engagement of HTML vs. FlashFlash. In Proceedings Museums and the Web 2004 International Conference. Available on-line at http://www.eduweb.com/ToFlashFlashornot.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sutcliffe, A.G. Heuristic evaluation of website attractiveness and usability. In GIST technical report G2001/1: Proceedings 8th Workshop on Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems (Glasgow) Dept of Computer Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, 2001, 188--199. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Sutcliffe, A. G. Assessing the reliability of heuristic evaluation for website attractiveness and usability. In Proceedings HICSS-35 Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Hawaii). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 2002, 1838--1847. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Sutcliffe, A.G., and De Angeli, A. Assessing interaction styles in web user. In Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction - Interact 2005 (Rome) M. F. Costabile & F. Paterno, Eds. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 405--417. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Tractinsky, N., and Zmiri, D. Exploring attributes of skins as potential antecedents of emotion in HCI. In P. Fishwick (Ed.), Aesthetic computing. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, in pressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Tractinsky, N., Shoval-Katz, A., and Ikar, D. What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers 13. 2, 127--145, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Interaction, usability and aesthetics: what influences users' preferences?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '06: Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems
      June 2006
      384 pages
      ISBN:1595933670
      DOI:10.1145/1142405

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 June 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader