ABSTRACT
In this paper we describe an evaluation of two websites with the same content but different interface styles (traditional menu-based and interactive metaphors). A formative usability evaluation was carried out with heuristic assessment of aesthetics, and questionnaire assessment of aesthetics, content, information quality, usability and post-test memory. The study revealed that perception of information quality is affected by the interaction style implemented in the interface, in a manner resembling the halo effect in person perception. Implications for website design and evaluation are discussed.
- Bernier, M. J. Establishing the psychometric properties of a scale for evaluating quality in printed educational materials. Patient Education and Counselling 29,3 (1996), 283--299Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bloch, P. Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. Journal of Marketing 59 (1995) 16--29.Google ScholarCross Ref
- De Angeli, A., Lynch, P., and Johnson G.I. Pleasure versus efficiency in user interfaces: Towards an involvement framework. In W. S. Green, & P. W. Jordan (Eds.), Pleasure with products: Beyond usability London: Taylor & Francis, (2002), 97--111.Google Scholar
- Dion, K., Berscheid, E., and Walster, E. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24 (1972), 285--290.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hassenzahl, M. The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product In M. Blythe, C. Overbeeke, A. Monk, and P.C. Wright (Eds), Funology: From usability to enjoyment, (2003), 31--42. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lavie, T., and Tractinsky, N. Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 60, 3 (2004) 269--298. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lindegaard, G., and Dudek, C. What is this evasive beast we call user satisfaction? Interacting with Computers 15, 3 (2003), 429--452.Google Scholar
- Meiners, M.L., and Sheposh, J.P. Beauty or brains: Which image for your mate? Personality and Social Psychology 3 (1977), 262--265.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Monk, A. The product as a fixed effect fallacy. Human-Computer Interaction 19, 4 (2004), 371--375. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Monk, A., Wright, P., Haber, J., and Davenport, L. Improving Your Human-Computer Interface: A Practical Technique. Prentice Hall, London, 1993.Google Scholar
- Norman, D.A. Beauty, goodness and usability: Introduction to the special section. Human-Computer Interaction 19, 4 (2004), 311--318. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Norman, D.A. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York, 2004.Google Scholar
- Overbeeke, K.C., Djajadiningrat, J.P., Hummels, C.C. M., and Wensveen, S.A.G. Beauty in usability: forget about ease of use.In W. S. Green, & P. W. Jordan (Eds.), Pleasure with products: Beyond usability. London: Taylor & Francis, (2002), 97--111Google Scholar
- Reeves, B., and Nass, C. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television and New Media Like Real People and Places. CLSI/Cambridge University Press, Stanford CA/Cambridge, 1996 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schaller, D.T., Allison-Bunnell, S., Chow, A., Marty, P., and Heo, M.,. To FlashFlash or not to FlashFlash? Usability and user engagement of HTML vs. FlashFlash. In Proceedings Museums and the Web 2004 International Conference. Available on-line at http://www.eduweb.com/ToFlashFlashornot.pdf.Google Scholar
- Sutcliffe, A.G. Heuristic evaluation of website attractiveness and usability. In GIST technical report G2001/1: Proceedings 8th Workshop on Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems (Glasgow) Dept of Computer Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, 2001, 188--199. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sutcliffe, A. G. Assessing the reliability of heuristic evaluation for website attractiveness and usability. In Proceedings HICSS-35 Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Hawaii). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 2002, 1838--1847. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sutcliffe, A.G., and De Angeli, A. Assessing interaction styles in web user. In Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction - Interact 2005 (Rome) M. F. Costabile & F. Paterno, Eds. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 405--417. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tractinsky, N., and Zmiri, D. Exploring attributes of skins as potential antecedents of emotion in HCI. In P. Fishwick (Ed.), Aesthetic computing. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, in pressGoogle Scholar
- Tractinsky, N., Shoval-Katz, A., and Ikar, D. What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers 13. 2, 127--145, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Interaction, usability and aesthetics: what influences users' preferences?
Recommendations
Economic and subjective measures of the perceived value of aesthetics and usability
The assessment of the relative value of different design features for users is of great interest for software designers. Users' evaluations are generally measured through questionnaires. We suggest that other evaluation methods, including economic ...
Exploring the boundary conditions of the effect of aesthetics on perceived usability
A growing body of usability research suggests that the aesthetics of a system affects users' perceptions of the usability of that system. But the causal relationship between aesthetics and usability and the direction of that relation have not been ...
Is beautiful really usable? Toward understanding the relation between usability, aesthetics, and affect in HCI
This paper analyzes the relation between usability and aesthetics. In a laboratory study, 80 participants used one of four different versions of the same online shop, differing in interface-aesthetics (low vs. high) and interface-usability (low vs. high)...
Comments