skip to main content
10.1145/1137856.1137897acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessocgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The density of iterated crossing points and a gap result for triangulations of finite point sets

Published:05 June 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Consider a plane graph G, drawn with straight lines. For every pair a,b of vertices of G, we compare the shortest-path distance between a and b in G (with Euclidean edge lengths) to their actual distance in the plane. The worst-case ratio of these two values, for all pairs of points, is called the dilation of G. All finite plane graphs of dilation 1 have been classified. They are closely related to the following iterative procedure. For a given point set PR2, we connect every pair of points in P by a line segment and then add to P all those points where two such line segments cross. Repeating this process infinitely often, yields a limit point set PP. This limit set P is finite if and only if P is contained in the vertex set of a triangulation of dilation 1.The main result of this paper is the following gap theorem: For any finite point set P in the plane for which P is infinite, there exists a threshold λ > 1 such that P is not contained in the vertex set of any finite plane graph of dilation at most λ. As a first ingredient to our proof, we show that such an infinite P must lie dense in a certain region of the plane. In the second, more difficult part, we then construct a concrete point set P0 such that any planar graph that contains this set amongst its vertices must have a dilation larger than 1.0000047.

References

  1. P. Agarwal, R. Klein, Ch. Knauer, S. Langerman, P. Morin, M. Sharir, and M. Soss. Computing the Detour and Spanning Ratio of Paths, Trees and Cycles in 2D and 3D. To appear in Discrete Comput. Geom., 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. K. Bezdek and J. Pach. A Point Set Everywhere Dense in the Plane. Elemente der Mathematik 40(4): 81--84, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Dumitrescu, A. Ebbers-Baumann, A. Grüne, R. Klein, and G. Rote, On the Geometric Dilation of Closed Curves, Graphs, and Point Sets. To appear in Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Dumitrescu, A. Ebbers-Baumann, A. Grüne, R. Klein, and G. Rote. On Geometric Dilation and Halving Chords. In F. Dehne, A. López-Ortiz, J.-R. Sack (eds.) Proceedings WADS'05, pp. 244--255, LNCS 3608, Springer-Verlag, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Ebbers-Baumann, R. Klein, E. Langetepe, and A. Lingas. A Fast Algorithm for Approximating the Detour of a Polygonal Chain. Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications, 27:123--134, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Ebbers-Baumann, A. Grüne, and R. Klein. Geometric Dilation of Closed Planar Curves: New Lower Bounds. To appear in Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Ebbers-Baumann, A. Grüne, and R. Klein. On the Geometric Dilation of Finite Point Sets. Algorithmica 44(2), pp. 137--149, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Ebbers-Baumann, A. Grüne, M. Karpinski, R. Klein, Ch. Knauer, and A. Lingas. Embedding Point Sets into Plane Graphs of Small Dilation. In X. Deng und D. Du (eds.) Proceedings ISAAC 2005, pp. 5--16, LNCS 3827, Springer-Verlag, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Eppstein. Spanning trees and spanners. In Handbook of Computational Geometry, J.-R. Sack and J. Urrutia (eds.), pp. 425-461. Elsevier, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. D. Eppstein. The Geometry Junkyard. http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/junkyard/dilation-free/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Eppstein and A. Wortman. Minimum Dilation Stars. Proceedings 21th Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Geomtry, pp. 321--326, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. D. Ismailescu and R. Radoičić. A Dense Planar Point Set from Iterated Line Intersections. Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications, 27(3), pp. 257--267, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Kamali. On the Density of Iterated Segment Intersections. Diploma Thesis. Bonn, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J.M. Keil and C.A. Gutwin. The Delaunay Triangulation Closely Approximates the Complete Euclidean Graph. Discrete Comput. Geom. 7, 1992, pp. 13--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. Lorenz. On the Dilation of Finite Point Sets. Diploma Thesis. Bonn, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Matouvsek. Lectures on Discrete Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. G. Narasimhan and M. Smid. Approximating the Stretch Factor of Euclidean Graphs. SIAM J. Comput. 30(3), 2000, pp. 978--989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. G. Narasimhan and M. Smid. Geometric Spanner Networks. Cambridge University Press, to appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The density of iterated crossing points and a gap result for triangulations of finite point sets

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SCG '06: Proceedings of the twenty-second annual symposium on Computational geometry
      June 2006
      500 pages
      ISBN:1595933409
      DOI:10.1145/1137856
      • Program Chairs:
      • Nina Amenta,
      • Otfried Cheong

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 June 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate625of1,685submissions,37%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader