skip to main content
10.1145/1135777.1135845acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Retroactive answering of search queries

Published:23 May 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Major search engines currently use the history of a user's actions (e.g., queries, clicks) to personalize search results. In this paper, we present a new personalized service, query-specific web recommendations (QSRs), that retroactively answers queries from a user's history as new results arise. The QSR system addresses two important subproblems with applications beyond the system itself: (1) Automatic identification of queries in a user's history that represent standing interests and unfulfilled needs. (2) Effective detection of interesting new results to these queries. We develop a variety of heuristics and algorithms to address these problems, and evaluate them through a study of Google history users. Our results strongly motivate the need for automatic detection of standing interests from a user's history, and identifies the algorithms that are most useful in doing so. Our results also identify the algorithms, some which are counter-intuitive, that are most useful in identifying interesting new results for past queries, allowing us to achieve very high precision over our data set.

References

  1. Amazon website. http://www.amazon.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Babu and J. Widom. Continuous queries over data streams. In SIGMOD Record, September 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Breese, D. Heckerman, and C. Kadie. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In Proc. of the Conference on Uncertainty in Artifical Intelligence, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Chen, D. DeWitt, F. Tian, and Y. Wang. Niagaracq: A scalable continuous query system for internet databases. In Proc. of SIGMOD, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. Goldberg, D. Nichols, B. Oki, and D. Terry. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. In Communications of the ACM, December 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Google website. http://www.google.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Google Web Alerts. http://www.google.com/alerts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Herlocker, J. Konstan, A. Borchers, and J. Riedl. An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In SIGIR, August 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Jeh and J. Widom. Scaling personalized web search. In Proc. of WWW 2003, May 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. U. Lee, Z. Liu, and J. Cho. Automatic identification of user goals in web search. In Proc. of WWW 2005, May 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. F. Liu, C. Yu, and W. Meng. Personalized web search by mapping user queries to categories. In Proc. of the Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, November 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Madden, M. Shah, J. Hellerstein, and J. Raman. Continuously adaptive continuous queries over streams. In Proc. of SIGMOD, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Melville, R. Mooney, and R. Nagarajan. Content-boosted collaborative filtering for improved recommenadtions. In Proc. of the Conference on Artifical Intelligence, July 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. H. Hwanga nd M. Balazinska, A. Rasin, U. Cetintemel, M. Stonebraker, and S. Zdonik. High availability algorithms for distributed stream processing. In Proc. of the 21st International Conference on Data Engineering, April 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Pitkow, H. Schutze, T. Cass, R. Cooley, D. Turnbull, A. Edmonds, E. Edar, and T. Breuel. Personalized search. In Communications of the ACM, 45(9):50--55, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Popescul, L. Ungar, D. Pennock, and S. Lawrence. Probabilistic models for unified collaborative and content-based recommendation in sparse-data environments. In Proc. of the Conference on Uncertainty in Artifical Intelligence, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. Rose and D. Levinson. Understanding user goals in web search. In World Wide Web Conference (WWW), 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. K. Sugiyama, K. Hatano, and M. Yoshikawa. Adaptive web search based on user profile constructed without any effort from users. In Proc. of WWW, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. Sun, H. Zeng, H. Liu, Y. Lu, and Z. Chen. Cubesvd: A novel approach to personalized web search. In Proc. of WWW 2005, 2005 May. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Yahoo website. http://www.yahoo.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. B. Yang and G. Jeh. Retroactive answering of search queries. Technical report, 2006. Extended version, available upon request.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Retroactive answering of search queries

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WWW '06: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web
        May 2006
        1102 pages
        ISBN:1595933239
        DOI:10.1145/1135777

        Copyright © 2006 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 May 2006

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

        Upcoming Conference

        WWW '24
        The ACM Web Conference 2024
        May 13 - 17, 2024
        Singapore , Singapore

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader