Paul Dourish
ABSTRACT
Although ethnography has become a common approach in HCI research and design, considerable confusion still attends both ethnographic practice and the criteria by which it should be evaluated in HCI. Often, ethnography is seen as an approach to field investigation that can generate requirements for systems development; by that token, the major evaluative criterion for an ethnographic study is the implications it can provide for design. Exploring the nature of ethnographic inquiry, this paper suggests that "implications for design" may not be the best metric for evaluation and may, indeed, fail to capture the value of ethnographic investigations.
- Ackerman, M. 2000. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 179--203. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Anderson, R. 1994. Representation and Requirements: The Value of Ethnography in System Design. Human-Computer Interaction, 9(2), 151--182.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bazerman, C. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
- Becker, H. 1993. Theory: The Necessary Evil. In Flinders and Mills (eds), Theory and Concepts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives from the Field, 218--229. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Beyer, H. and Holtzblatt, K. 1997. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufman. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Button, G. 2000. The Ethnographic Tradition and Design. Design Studies, 21, 319--332.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Campbell, D. T. 1969. Ethnocentrism of Disciplines and the Fishscale Model of Omniscience. In: Sherif and Sherif (eds), Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences, 328--348. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
- Clifford, C. 1983. On Ethnographic Authority. Representations, 2, 118--146.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cypher, A. 1993. Watch What I Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Dourish, P. and Button, G. 1998. On Technomethodology: Foundational Relationships between Ethnomethodology and Systems Design. Human-Computer Interaction, 13(4), 395--432. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Forsythe, D. 1989. It's Just a Matter of Common Sense: Ethnography as Invisible Work. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 8(1--2), 127--145. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frost, P. and Stablien, R. (eds). 1992. Doing Exemplary Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Gaver, W., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. 1999. Cultural Probes. interactions, 6(1), 21--29. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Geertz, C. 1988. Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Geertz, C. 2000. Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Geiryn, T. 1983. Boundary Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(4), 781--795.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Grudin, J. 1990. The Computer Reaches Out: The Historical Continuity of Interface Design. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI'90 (Seattle, WA), 261--268. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. 1997. Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
- Hill, R. 1995. Blackfellas and Whitefellas: Aboriginal Land Rights, The Mabo Decision, and the Meaning of Land. Human Rights Quarterly, 17(2), 303--322.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hughes, J., Randall, D., and Shapiro, D. 1993. From Ethnographic Record to System Design: Some Experiences from the Field. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 1, 123--141.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hutchinson, H., Hansen, H., Roussel, N., Eiderbäck, B., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Conversy, S., and Evans, H. 2003. Technology Probes: Inspiring Design For and With Families. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2003 (Ft Lauderdale, FL), 17--24. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kling, R., McKim, G., Fortuna, J. and King, A. 2000. Scientific Collaboratories as Socio-Technical Interaction Networks: A Theoretical Approach. American Conference on Information Systems.Google Scholar
- Levi-Strauss, C. 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Mackay, W. 1990. Patterns of Sharing Customizable Software. Proc. ACM Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work CSCW'90 (Los Angeles, CA), 209-221. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- MacLean, A., Carter, K., Lövstrand, L., and Moran, T. 1990. User-Tailorable Systems: Pressing the Issues with Buttons. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI'90 (Seattle, WA). New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Malinowski, B. 1967. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Marcus, G. 1995. Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95--117.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marcus, G. and Fischer, M. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Social Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Miller, D. and Slater, D. 2000. The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
- Nardi, B. 1993. A Small Matter of Programming: Perspectives on End-User Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Plowman, L., Rogers, Y., and Ramage, M. 1995. What are Workplace Studies For? Proc. European Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW'95 (Stockholm, Sweden). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Povinelli, E. 1995. Do Rocks Listen? The Cultural Politics of Apprehending Aboriginal Labor. American Anthropologist, 97(3), 505--518.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rogers, Y. 1997. Reconfiguring the Social Scientist: Shifting from Telling Designers What to Do to Getting More Involved. In Bowker et al., Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, K. 2000. The Critical Role of Workplace Studies in CSCW. In Heath, Hindmarsh, and Luff (eds), Workplace Studies: Rediscovering Work Practice and Informing Design. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Suchman, L. 2002. Practice-Based Design of Information Systems: Notes from the Hyperdeveloped World. The Information Society, 18, 139--144.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Implications for design
Recommendations
Responsibilities and implications: further thoughts on ethnography and design
DUX '07: Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing for User eXperiencesMany researchers and practitioners in user experience design have turned towards social sciences to find ways to understand the social contexts in which both users and technologies are embedded. Ethnographic approaches are increasingly prominent as ...
Design ethnography in information systems
Until recently, most ethnographic research in information systems has been based on the traditional anthropological model of ethnography. In this traditional model of ethnography, one of the most important data-gathering techniques is participant ...
Al Osool: Understanding information behavior for community development at Za'atari Syrian refugee camp
C&T '19: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Transforming CommunitiesZa'atari Syrian Refugee Camp in Jordan is home to about 83,000 people fleeing the violence in Syria. Building on a multi-year engagement at Za'atari, we developed an information-enabled community engagement approach to identify and address challenges at ...
Comments