Abstract
We revisit the problem of conveying classical messages by transmitting quantum states, and derive new, optimal bounds on the number of quantum bits required for this task. Much of the previous work on this problem, and on other communication tasks in the setting of bounded error entanglement-assisted communication, is based on sophisticated information theoretic arguments. Our results are derived from first principles, using a simple linear algebraic technique. A direct consequence is a tight lower bound for the Inner Product function that has found applications to privacy amplification in quantum key distribution protocols.
- Ambainis, A., Nayak, A., Ta-Shma, A., and Vazirani, U. 2002. Dense quantum coding and quantum finite automata. J. ACM 49, 4 (July), 1--16.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ambainis, A., Schulman, L. J., Ta-Shma, A., Vazirani, U., and Wigderson, A. 2003. Quantum communication complexity of sampling. SIAM J. Comput. 32, 1570--1585.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bar-Yossef, Z., Jayram, T. S., and Kerenidis, I. 2004. Exponential separation of quantum and classical one-way communication complexity. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. ACM, New York, 128--137.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ben-Or, M. 1999. Simple security proof for quantum key distribution. Unpublished. (See talk given during the MSRI special semester on quantum computation in 2002: http://www.msri.org/publications/ln/msri/2002/qip/ben-or/1/index.html.)]]Google Scholar
- Bennett, C. H., and Brassard, G. 1984. Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing. IEEE Computer Society, Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 175.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., and Wootters, W. K. 1993. Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein--Podolsky--Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895--1899.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bennett, C. H., and Shor, P. W. 1998. Quantum information theory. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory IT-44, 6, 2724--2742.]]Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bennett, C. H., and Wiesner, S. J. 1992. Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881--2884.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bernstein, E., and Vazirani, U. V. 1997. Quantum complexity theory. SIAM J. Comput. 26, 5, 1411--1473.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Buhrman, H., Cleve, R., and Wigderson, A. 1998. Quantum vs. classical communication and computation. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. ACM Press, New York, 63--68.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Buhrman, H., and de Wolf, R. 2001. Communication complexity lower bounds by polynomials. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 120--130.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cleve, R., and Buhrman, H. 1997. Substituting quantum entanglement for communication. Phys. Rev. A 56, 2, 1201--1204.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cleve, R., van Dam, W., Nielsen, M., and Tapp, A. 1998. Quantum entanglement and the communication complexity of the inner product function. In Quantum Computing and Quantum Communications, Proceedings of the 1st NASA International Conference. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1509. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 61--74.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cover, T. M., and Thomas, J. A. 1991. Elements of Information Theory. Wiley Series in Telecommunications. Wiley, New York.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- de Wolf, R. 2005. Lower bounds on matrix rigidity via a quantum argument. Tech. rep., Arxiv.org Preprint Archive. (Available at http://www.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0505188.)]]Google Scholar
- Goldreich, O. 1995. Three XOR-lemmas---An exposition. Tech. Rep. TR95-056, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity. (Available at http://eccc.uni-trier.de/eccc/.)]]Google Scholar
- Holevo, A. 1973. Some estimates of the information transmitted by quantum communication channels. Prob. Inf. Trans. 9, 3, 177--183. (Russian version in Problemy Peredachi Informatsii 9 (1973), 3--11.)]]Google Scholar
- Kerenidis, I., and de Wolf, R. 2004. Exponential lower bound for 2-query locally decodable codes. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 69, 3, 395--420. (Special issue for STOC 2003.)]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Klauck, H. 2000. On quantum and probabilistic communication: Las Vegas and one-way protocols. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. ACM, New York, 644--651.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Klauck, H. 2001a. Lower bounds for quantum communication complexity. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 288--297.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Klauck, H. 2001b. One-way communication complexity and the Neciporuk lower bound on formula size. Tech. rep., Arxiv.org Preprint Archive. (Available at http://www.arxiv.org/abs/cs.CC/0111062.)]]Google Scholar
- Klauck, H., Nayak, A., Ta-Shma, A., and Zuckerman, D. 2001. Interaction in quantum communication and the complexity of Set Disjointness. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. ACM, New York, 124--133.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kremer, I. 1995. Quantum communication. M.S. thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.]]Google Scholar
- Kushilevitz, E., and Nisan, N. 1997. Communication Complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lo, H.-K., and Chau, H. F. 1997. Is quantum bit commitment really possible? Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3410--3413.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mayers, D. 1997. Unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment is impossible. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 17, 3414--3417.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nayak, A. 1999. Lower bounds for quantum computation and communication. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nielsen, M. A., and Chuang, I. L. 2000. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Preskill, J. 1998. Quantum computation. Lecture Notes, available at http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/preskill/ph229/, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.]]Google Scholar
- Raz, R. 1999. Exponential separation of quantum and classical communication complexity. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. ACM, New York, 358--367.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Raz, R. 2005. Quantum information and the PCP theorem. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 459--468.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Razborov, A. 2003. Quantum communication complexity of symmetric predicates. Izvestiya: Mathematics 67, 1, 145--159. (Russian version in Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Academii Nauk (seriya matematicheskaya) 67 (2003), 1, 159--176.)]]Google Scholar
- van Dam, W., and Hayden, P. 2002. Renyi-entropic bounds on quantum communication. Tech. rep., Arxiv.org Preprint Archive. Available at http://www.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0204093.]]Google Scholar
- Yao, A. C.-C. 1993. Quantum circuit complexity. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 352--361.]]Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Limits on the ability of quantum states to convey classical messages
Recommendations
Dense quantum coding and quantum finite automata
We consider the possibility of encoding m classical bits into many fewer n quantum bits (qubits) so that an arbitrary bit from the original m bits can be recovered with good probability. We show that nontrivial quantum codes exist that have no classical ...
On communication over an entanglement-assisted quantum channel
STOC '02: Proceedings of the thiry-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computingShared entanglement is a resource available to parties communicating over a quantum channel, much akin to public coins in classical communication protocols. Whereas shared randomness does not help in the transmission of information, or significantly ...
Can quantum discord increase in a quantum communication task?
Quantum teleportation of an unknown quantum state is one of the few communication tasks which has no classical counterpart. Usually the aim of teleportation is to send an unknown quantum state to a receiver. But is it possible in some way that the ...
Comments