Eduard Hovy
ABSTRACT
This paper consists of three parts: a preliminary typology of summaries in general; a description of the current and planned modules and performance of the SUMMARIST automated multilingual text summarization system being built sat ISI, and a discussion of three methods to evaluate summaries.
- Aone, C., M. E. Okurowski, J. Gorlinsky, B. Larsen. 1998. A Scalable Summarization System using Robust NLP. In I. Mani and M. Maybury (eds), Advances in Automated Text Summarization. MIT Press.]]Google Scholar
- Bagga, A. and B. Baldwin. 1998. Entity-Based Cross-Document Cross-Referencing using the Vector Space Model. In Proceedings of COLING/ACL, 79--86. Montreal, Canada.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Baldwin, B. 1998. Reworking of TIPSTER/SUMMAC Dry Run Evaluation Results. University of Pennsylvania Report.]]Google Scholar
- Baxendale, P. B. 1958. Machine-Made Index for Technical Literature---An Experiment. IBM Journal (October) 354--361.]]Google Scholar
- Brill, E. 1992. A Corpus-Based Approach to Language Learning. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Edmundson, H. P. 1968. New Methods in Automatic Extraction. Journal of the ACM 16(2), 264--285.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elhadad, M. 1992. Using Argumentation to Control Lexical Choice: A Functional Unification-Based Approach. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Endres-Niggemeyer. B. 1997. SimSum: Simulation of Summatizing. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Summarization at the ACL/EACL Conference, 89--96. Madrid, Spain.]]Google Scholar
- Firmin Hand, T. and B. Sundheim. 1998. TIPSTER-SUMMAC Summarization Evaluation. Proceedings of the TIPSTER Text Phase III Workshop. Washington.]]Google Scholar
- Hovy, E. H. and L. Wanner. 1996. Managing Sentence Planning Requirements. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Gaps and Bridges in NL Planning and Generation, 53--58. ECAI Conference. Budapest, Hungary.]]Google Scholar
- Hovy, E. H. 1998. Combining and Standardizing Large-Scale, Practical Ontologies for Machine Translation and Other Uses. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 535--542. Granada, Spain.]]Google Scholar
- Hovy, E. H. and M. Junk. In prep.]]Google Scholar
- Hovy, E. H. and C-Y. Lin. 1998. Automating Text Summarization in SUMMARIST. In I. Mani and M. Maybury (eds), Advances in Automated Text Summarization. MIT Press.]]Google Scholar
- Hovy, E. H. The Evaluation of Summaries. In prep.]]Google Scholar
- Knight, K. and S. K. Luk. 1994. Building a Large-Scale Knowledge Base for Machine Translation. Proceedings of the Conference of the American Association of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-94), 773--778. Seattle, WA.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kupiec, J., J. Pedersen, and F. Chen. 1995. A Trainable Document Summarizer. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual International ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), 68--73. Seattle, WA.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Langkilde, I. and K. Knight. 1998. Generation that Exploits Corpus Knowledge. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL Conference, 704--709. Montreal, Canada.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lavoie, B. and O. Rambow. 1997. A Fast and Portable Realizer for Text Generation Systems. In Proceedings of the Applied Natural Language Processing Conference (ANLP-97), 265--270. Washington, DC.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lin, C-Y. 1995. Topic Identification by Concept Generalization. In Proceedings of the Thirty-third Conference of the Association of Computational Linguistics (ACL-95), 308--310. Boston, MA.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lin, C-Y. 1997. Robust Automated Topic Identification. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lin, C-Y. and E. H. Hovy. 1997. Identifying Topics by Position. In Proceedings of the Applied Natural Language Processing Conference (ANLP-97), 283 -- 290. Washington, DC.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lin, C-Y. and E. H. Hovy. 1998. Automatic Text Categorization: A Concept-Based Approach. In prep.]]Google Scholar
- Lin, C-Y. Training a Selection Function for Extraction in SUMMARIST. In prep.]]Google Scholar
- Liu, H. and E. H. Hovy. Automated Learning of Cue Phrases for Text Summarization. In prep.]]Google Scholar
- Luhn, H. P. 1959. The Automatic Creation of Literature Abstracts. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 159--165.]]Google Scholar
- Mann, W. C. and S. A. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization. Text 8(3) (243--281).]]Google Scholar
- Marcu, D. 1997. The Rhetorical Parsing, Summarization, and Generation of Natural Language Texts. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marcu, D. 1998. The Automatic Construction of Large-scale Corpora for Summarization Research. Forthcoming.]]Google Scholar
- Marcu, D. 1998a. Improving Summarization through Rhetorical Parsing Tuning. Proceedings of the COLING-ACL Workshop on Very Large Corpora. Montreal, Canada.]]Google Scholar
- Marcu, D. 1998b. Automated Creation of Extracts from Texts and Abstracts. In prep.]]Google Scholar
- McKeown, K. R. and D. R. Radev. 1995. Generating Summaries of Multiple News Articles. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual International ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), 74--82. Seattle, WA.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Miller, G., R. Beckwith, C. Fellbaum, D. Gross, and K. Miller. 1990. Five papers on WordNet. CSL Report 43, Cognitive Science Laboratory, Princeton University.]]Google Scholar
- Mitra, M., A. Singhal, and C. Buckley. 1997. Automatic Text Summarization by Paragraph Extraction. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Summarization at the ACL/EACL Conference, 39--46. Madrid, Spain.]]Google Scholar
- Nirenburg, S., V. Lesser, and E. Nyberg. 1989. Controlling a Language Generation Planner. In Proceedings of IJCAI, 1524--1530. Detroit, MI.]]Google Scholar
- The Penman Primer, User Guide, and Reference Manual. 1988. Unpublished documentation, Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California.]]Google Scholar
- Quinlan, J. R. 1986. Induction of Decision Trees. Machine Learning 81--106.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rambow, O. and T. Korelsky. 1992. Applied Text Generation. In Proceedings of the Applied Natural Language Processing Conference (ANLP). Trento, Italy]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Salton, G. 1988. Automatic Text Processing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shannon, C. 1951. Prediction and Entropy of Printed English. Bell System Technical Journal, January 1951.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Spärck Jones, K. 1998. Introduction to Text Summarisation. In I. Mani and M. Maybury (eds), Advances in Automated Text Summarization. MIT Press.]]Google Scholar
- Strzalkowski, T. et al., 1998. ? In I. Mani and M. Maybury (eds), Advances in Automated Text Summarization. MIT Press.]]Google Scholar
- Tait, J. I. and K. Spärck Jones. 1982. Automatic Summarising of English Texts. Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge University.]]Google Scholar
- Teufel, S. and M. Moens. 1998. Sentence Extraction as a Classification Task. In I. Mani and M. Maybury (eds), Advances in Automated Text Summarization. MIT Press.]]Google Scholar
- TREC. Harman, D. (ed). 1995. Proceedings of the TREC Conference.]]Google Scholar
- Van Dijk, T. A. and W. Kintsch. 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.]]Google Scholar
Recommendations
Multi-document Hyperedge-based Ranking for Text Summarization
CIKM '14: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge ManagementIn a multi-document settings, graph-based extractive summarization approaches build a similarity graph out of sentences in each cluster of documents then use graph centrality approaches to measure the importance of sentences. The similarity is computed ...
Extractive text summarization using clustering-based topic modeling
AbstractText summarization is the process of converting the input document into a short form, provided that it preserves the overall meaning associated with it. Primarily, text summarization is achieved in two ways, i.e., abstractive and extractive. ...
An Ontology-Based Approach to Text Summarization
WI-IAT '08: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 03Extractive text summarization aims to create a condensed version of one or more source documents by selecting the most informative sentences. Research in text summarization has therefore often focused on measures of the usefulness of sentences for a ...
Comments