Aldo de Moor
Abstract
A plethora of technologies exist that are not necessarily tools. For technologies to become a tool, we contend, argumentation routines and design must coevolve.
- Aakhus, M. Modeling reconstruction in groupware technology. Advances in Pragma-Dialectics. F.H. van Eemeren, Ed. Sic Sat, Amsterdam, 2002.Google Scholar
- Ackerman, M.S. The intellectual challenge of CSCW: The gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction 15, 2 (2000), 179--203. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Conklin, J. The IBIS Manual: A Short Course in IBIS Methodology. Touchstone, 2003.Google Scholar
- Conklin, J., Selvin, A., Buckingham Shum, S., and Sierhuis, M. Facilitated hypertext for collective sensemaking: 15 Years on from gIBIS. In Proceedings of the 8th International Working Conference on the Language/Action Perspective on Communication Modeling. (Tilburg, the Netherlands, July 1--2, 2003).Google Scholar
- Denning, P.J. Accomplishment. Commun. ACM 46, 7 (July 2003), 19--23. Google ScholarDigital Library
- GroupSystems; www.groupsupport.com/en/products/groupsystems_tools. shtml (accessed Nov. 12, 2005).Google Scholar
- Harrison, T.M. and Stephen, T. On-line disciplines: Computer-mediated scholarship in the humanities and social sciences. Computers and the Humanities. 26 (1992), 181---193.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Heng, M. and de Moor, A. From Habermas's communicative theory to practice on the Internet. IS Journal 13, 4 (2003), 331--352.Google Scholar
- O'Keefe, D. Two concepts of argument. J. American Forensic Association 13 (1977), 121--128.Google Scholar
- van Eemeren, F.H. and Grootendorst, R. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussion. Foris Publications, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 1984.Google ScholarCross Ref
- van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R., and Henkemans, F. Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1996.Google Scholar
- Winograd, T. and Flores, F. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1986. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Argumentation support: from technologies to tools
Recommendations
Support in Abstract Argumentation
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010In this paper, we consider two drawbacks of Cayrol and Lagasque-Schiex's meta-argumentation theory to model bipolar argumentation frameworks. We consider first the “lost of admissibility” in Dung's sense and second, the definition of notions of attack ...
Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
We present two dialectic procedures for the sceptical ideal semantics for argumentation. The first procedure is defined in terms of dispute trees, for abstract argumentation frameworks. The second procedure is defined in dialectical terms, for ...
Computing Arguments and Attacks in Assumption-Based Argumentation
CaSAPI (Credulous and Skeptical Argumentation: Prolog Implementation) 3.0 determines the acceptability of claims, using the general-purpose framework of assumption-based argumentation, under the semantics of admissible extensions. This framework reduces ...
Comments