skip to main content
10.1145/1102351.1102426acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

High speed obstacle avoidance using monocular vision and reinforcement learning

Published:07 August 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

We consider the task of driving a remote control car at high speeds through unstructured outdoor environments. We present an approach in which supervised learning is first used to estimate depths from single monocular images. The learning algorithm can be trained either on real camera images labeled with ground-truth distances to the closest obstacles, or on a training set consisting of synthetic graphics images. The resulting algorithm is able to learn monocular vision cues that accurately estimate the relative depths of obstacles in a scene. Reinforcement learning/policy search is then applied within a simulator that renders synthetic scenes. This learns a control policy that selects a steering direction as a function of the vision system's output. We present results evaluating the predictive ability of the algorithm both on held out test data, and in actual autonomous driving experiments.

References

  1. Barron, J., Fleet, D., & Beauchemin, S. (1994). Performance of optical flow techniques. Int'l Journal of Computer Vision, 12, 43--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Blthoff, I., Blthoff, H., & Sinha, P. (1998). Top-down influences on stereoscopic depth-perception. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 254--257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Criminisi, A., Reid, I., & Zisserman, A. (2000). Single view metrology. Int'l Journal of Computer Vision, 40, 123--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Davies, E. (1997). Machine vision: Theory, algorithms, practicalities 2nd ed. Academic Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gini, G., & Marchi, A. (2002). Indoor robot navigation with single camera vision. Proc. Pattern Recognition in Information Systems, PRIS, Spain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Honig, J., Heit, B., & Bremont, J. (1996). Visual depth perception based on optical blur. Proc. of Int'l Conf. on Image Processing (pp. 721--724).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Huber, P. (1981). Robust statistics. New York: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jahne, B., & Geissler, P. (1994). Depth from focus with one image. Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR (pp. 713--717).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kardas, E. (2005). Monocular cues in depth perception. {Online}: http://peace.saumag.edu/faculty/Kardas/Courses/GP Weiten/C4SandP/MonoCues.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kearns, M., & Singh, S. (1999). Finite-sample rates of convergence for q-learning and indirect methods. NIPS 11 (pp. 996--1002). The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kim, M., & Uther, W. (2003). Automatic gait optimisation for quadruped robots. Proc. Australasian Conf. on Robotics and Automation (pp. 1--9).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Klarquist, W., Geisler, W., & Bovik, A. (1995). Maximum-likelihood depth-from-defocus for active vision. Proc. Int'l Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 374--379).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kohl, N., & Stone, P. (2004). Policy gradient reinforcement learning for fast quadrupedal locomotion. Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Robotics and Automation.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Kudo, H., Saito, M., Yamamura, T., & Ohnishi, N. (1999). Measurement of the ability in monocular depth perception during gazing at near visual target-effect of the ocular parallax cue. Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Systems, Man & Cybernetics (pp. 34--37).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. LeCun, Y. (2003). Presentation at Navigation, Locomotion and Articulation workshop. Washington DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Loomis, J. M. (2001). Looking down is looking up. Nature News and Views, 414, 155--156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Nagai, T., Naruse, T., Ikehara, M., & Kurematsu, A. (2002). Hmm-based surface reconstruction from single images. Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. on Image Processing (pp. II--561 -- 11--564).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. (2000). Pegasus: A policy search method for large mdps and pomdps. Proc. 16th Conf. UAI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Pomerleau, D. (1989). An autonomous land vehicle in a neural network. NIPS 1. Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Scharstein, D., & Szeliski. R. (2002). A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms. Int'l Journal of Computer Vision, 47, 7--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Shao, M., Simchony, T., & Chellappa, R. (1988). New algorithms from reconstruction of a 3-d depth map from one or more images. Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR (pp. 530--535).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Wu, B., Ooi, T. L., & He, Z. J. (2004). Perceiving distance accurately by a directional process of integrating ground information. Letters to Nature, 428, 73 77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. High speed obstacle avoidance using monocular vision and reinforcement learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICML '05: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning
      August 2005
      1113 pages
      ISBN:1595931805
      DOI:10.1145/1102351

      Copyright © 2005 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 August 2005

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate140of548submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader