Matching human actors based on their texts: design and evaluation of an instance of the ExpertFinding framework

ABSTRACT

Bringing together human actors with similar interests, skills or expertise is a major challenge in community-based knowledge management. We believe that writing or reading textual documents can be an indicator for a human actor's interests, skills or expertise. In this paper, we describe an approach of matching human actors based on the similarity of text collections that can be attributed to them. By integrating standard methods of text analysis, we extract and match user profiles based on a large collection of documents. We present an instance of the ExpertFinder Framework which measures the similarity of these profiles by means of the Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) algorithm. The quality of the algorithmic approach was evaluated by comparing its results with judgments of different human actors.

References

1. Ackerman, M. S. and McDonald, D. W. Answer Garden 2: Merging Organizational Memory with Collaborative Help. In International Conference on CSCW '96, ACM Press, New York, 1996, 97--105.
2. Ackerman, M.S. Augmenting Organizational Memory: A Field Study of Answer Garden, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), vol. 16, no. 3, 1998, 203--224.
3. Ackerman, M. S.; Pipek, V.; Wulf, V. (eds): Expertise Sharing: Beyond Knowledge Management, MIT Press, Cambridge MA 2003.
4. Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W., Weiber, R.: Multivariate Analysemethoden - Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Springer, Berlin 1996.
5. Balabanovic, M and Shoham, Y. Fab: Content-Based, Collaborative Recommendation. In: Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, no. 3, 1997, 66--72.
6. Battenfeld, J. Benutzer-Matching auf Basis automatischer Textanalyse. Ein Ansatz zur Ähnlichkeitsbestimmung von Benutzern durch Dokumentenanalyse für das ExpertFinder Framework. Diploma thesis, University of Siegen, 2005.
7. Becks, A.; Reichling, T.; Wulf, V.: Expert Finding: Approaches to Foster Social Capital, in: Huysman, M.; Wulf, V. (eds.): Social Capital and Information Technology, Cambridge MA 2004, 333--354.
8. Berry, M.W., Dumais, S. T., and O'Brien, G. W. Using linear algebra for intelligent information retrieval. SIAM Review, vol. 37, no. 4, 1995, 573--595.
9. Cohen, D. and Prusak, L. In Good Company: How Social Capital makes Organizations Work, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 2001.
10. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S., Furnas G., Landauer, T. and Harshman, R., Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, vol. 41, no. 6, 1990, 391--407.
11. Hinds, P. J. and Pfeffer, J. Why Organizations Don't "Know What They Know. In: Ackermann et al. Sharing Expertise - Beyond Knowledge Management, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2003, 3--26.
12. Heyer, G., Quasthoff, U. and Wolff, Ch. Möglichkeiten und Verfahren zur automatischen Gewinnung von Fachbegriffen aus Texten. http://wortschatz.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/asv/publikationen/HeyFachbegriffe100902.pdf, 2002, seen: 20.11.2004.
13. Kautz, H., Selman, B. and Shah, M. ReferralWeb: Combining Social Networks and Collaborative Filtering. In: Communications of the ACM, special issue, vol. 40, 1997, 63--65.
14. McArthur, R. and Bruza P. Discovery of implicit and explicit connections between people using email utterance. In: ECSCW 2003 - Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Helsinki, Finland, 2003, 21--40.
15. McDonald, D.W. Recommending Collaboration with Social Networks: A Comparative Evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems, Ft. Lauderdale, 2003, 593--600.
16. McDonald, D. W. Moving from Naturalistic Expertise Location to Expertise Recommendation. Dissertation thesis, University of California, Irvine, 2000.
17. McDonald, D. W. Evaluating Expertise Recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work, ACM Press, New York, 2001, 214--223.
18. Pipek, V. and Wulf, V. Pruning the Answer Garden: Knowledge Sharing in Maintenance Engineering. In: Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 2003), Helsinki, Finland, 14-18 September, 2003, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003, 1--20.
19. Porter, M.F. An algorithm for suffix stripping. http://www.tartarus.org/~martin/PorterStemmer/def.txt, 1980, seen: 06.11.2004.
20. Resnick, P. et al.: GroupLens: An Open Architecture for Collaborative Filtering of Netnews. In: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States 1994, 175--186.
21. Resnick, P. and Varian, Hal R. Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM, special issue, vol. 40, 1997, 56--58.
22. Runte, M. Personalisierung im Internet - Individualisierte Angebote mit Collaborative Filtering. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden 2000.
23. Rucker, J., Polanco, M.J. Personalized Navigation for the Web. Communications of the ACM, special issue, vol. 40, 1997, 73--75.
24. Snowball Main Page: German stemming algorithm. http://www.snowball.tartarus.org/german/stemmer.html, seen: 06.11.2004.
25. Streeter, L. A. and Lochbaum, K. E. Who Knows: A System Based on Automatic Representation of Semantic Structure. In: RIAO '88, Cambridge, MA, 1980, 380--388.
26. Sullivan, D. Document Warehousing and Text Mining. Wiley, New York 2001.
27. Terveen, L., Hill, W., Amento, B., McDonald, D. and Creter, J. PHOAKS: A System for Sharing Recommendations. In: Communications of the ACM, special issue, vol. 40, 1997, 59--62.
28. Tyler, J. R., Wilkinson, D. M. and Huberman, B. A., Email as spectroscopy: automated discovery of community structure within organizations, in: Huysman, M.; Wenger, E.; Wulf, V. (eds): Communities and technologies 2003, Kluwer, B.V, 81--96.
29. Vivacque, A. and Lieberman, H. Agents to assist in finding help, In: Proceedings in the Conference on Human Computer Interaction (CHI 2000), ACM Press, New York, 2000, 65--72.
30. Wenger, E. Communities of Practice, In: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.

Index Terms

• Information systems

  • Information retrieval

    • Document representation