skip to main content
10.1145/1095034.1095054acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Low-cost multi-touch sensing through frustrated total internal reflection

Published:23 October 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a simple, inexpensive, and scalable technique for enabling high-resolution multi-touch sensing on rear-projected interactive surfaces based on frustrated total internal reflection. We review previous applications of this phenomenon to sensing, provide implementation details, discuss results from our initial prototype, and outline future directions.

References

  1. Buxton, W., Hill, R., and Rowley, P. 1985. Issues and Techniques in Touch-Sensitive Tablet Input. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques SIGGRAPH '85. ACM Press, New York, NY, 215--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Dietz, P. and Leigh, D. 2001. DiamondTouch: A Multi-User Touch Technology. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Orlando, Florida, November 11 - 14, 2001). UIST '01. ACM Press, New York, NY, 219--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Fingerworks. iGesturePad. http://www.fingerworks.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Fujieda, I., Haga, H. 1997. Fingerprint Input based on Scattered-Light Detection. Applied Optics-IP, 36, 35, 9152-9156Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Greene, R. 1985. The Drawing Prism: A Versatile Graphic Input Device. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques SIGGRAPH '85. ACM Press, New York, NY, 103--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hillis, W. D. 1982. A High Resolution Imaging Touch Sensor. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1982, 1, 2, 33--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson, R. and Fryberger, D. 1972. Touch Actuable Data Input Panel Assembly. U.S. Patent 3,673,327. Jun. 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kamiyama, K., Vlack, K., Mizota, T., Kajimoto, H., Kawakami, N., and Tachi, S. 2005. Vision-Based Sensor for Real-Time Measuring of Surface Traction Fields. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 25, 1 (Jan. 2005), 68--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kasday, L. 1984. Touch Position Sensitive Surface. U.S. Patent 4,484,179. Nov. 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kunz, A. M. and Spagno, C. P. 2002. Technical System for Collaborative Work. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Virtual Environments 2002 (Barcelona, Spain, May 30 - 31, 2002). W. Sturzlinger and S. Muller, Eds. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol. 23. Eurographics Association, Airela-Ville, Switzerland, 73--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lee, S., Buxton, W., and Smith, K. C. 1985. A Multi-Touch Three Dimensional Touch-Sensitive Tablet. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Francisco, California, United States). CHI '85. ACM Press, New York, NY, 21--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Malik, S. and Laszlo, J. 2004. Visual Touchpad: A Two-Handed Gestural Input Device. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (State College, PA, USA, October 13 - 15, 2004). ICMI '04. ACM Press, New York, NY, 289-296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mallos, J. 1982. Touch Position Sensitive Surface. U.S. Patent 4,346,376. Aug. 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Matsushita, M., Iida, M., Ohguro, T., Shirai, Y., Kakehi, Y., and Naemura, T. 2004. Lumisight Table: A Face-to-face Collaboration Support System That Optimizes Direction of Projected Information to Each Stakeholder. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Chicago, Illinois, USA, November 06 - 10, 2004), CSCW '04. ACM Press, New York, NY, 274--283. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Matsushita, N. and Rekimoto, J. 1997. HoloWall: Designing a Finger, Hand, Body, and Object Sensitive Wall. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Banff, Alberta, Canada, October 14 - 17, 1997). UIST '97. ACM Press, New York, NY, 209--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mott, D. H., Lee, M. H., and Nicholls, H. 1986. An Experimental Very High Resolution Tactile Sensor Array. In Robot Sensors Vol. 2: Tactile and Non-Vision, Pugh, A., Ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 179--188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mueller, R. 1974. Direct Television Drawing and Image Manipulating System. U.S. Patent 3,846,826. Nov. 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Nicol, K., and Hennig, E. M. C. 1979. Apparatus for the Time-Dependant Measurement of Physical Quantities. U.S. Patent 4,134,063. Jan. 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Rekimoto, J. 2002. SmartSkin: An Infrastructure for Freehand Manipulation on Interactive Surfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI '02. ACM Press, New York, NY, 113-120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Tactex. Smart Fabric Technology. http://www.tactex.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Tanie, K., Komoriya, K., Kaneko, M., Tachis, S., and Fujikava, A. 1986. A High Resolution Tactile Sensor. In Robot Sensors Vol. 2: Tactile and Non-Vision, Pugh, A., Ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 189--198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Westerman, W. and Elias, J. G. 2001. Method and Apparatus for Integrating Manual Input. U.S. Patent 6,323,846. Nov. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Westerman, W., Elias, J. G., and Hedge, A. 2001. Multi-Touch: A New Tactile 2-D Gesture Interface for Human-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting (Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN, Oct. 2001), 632--636.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. White, R. M. 1987. Tactile Sensor Employing a Light Conducting Element and a Resiliently Deformable Sheet. U.S. Patent 4,668,861. May 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. White, W. 1965. Method for Optical Comparison of Skin Friction-Ridge Patterns. U.S. Patent 3,200,701. Aug. 1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilson, A. D. 2004. TouchLight: An Imaging Touch Screen and Display for Gesture-Based Interaction. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (State College, PA, USA, October 13 - 15, 2004). ICMI '04. ACM Press, New York, NY, 69--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Wu, M. and Balakrishnan, R. 2003. Multi-Finger and Whole Hand Gestural Interaction Techniques for Multi-User Tabletop Displays. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Vancouver, Canada, November 02 - 05, 2003). UIST '03. ACM Press, New York, NY, 193--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Low-cost multi-touch sensing through frustrated total internal reflection

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '05: Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
      October 2005
      270 pages
      ISBN:1595932712
      DOI:10.1145/1095034

      Copyright © 2005 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 October 2005

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      UIST '05 Paper Acceptance Rate31of159submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader