skip to main content
10.1145/1094562.1094569acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesccConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Reflective design

Published:20 August 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

As computing moves into every aspect of our daily lives, the values and assumptions that underlie our technical practices may unwittingly be propagated throughout our culture. Drawing on existing critical approaches in computing, we argue that reflection on unconscious values embedded in computing and the practices that it supports can and should be a core principle of technology design. Building on a growing body of work in critical computing, reflective design combines analysis of the ways in which technologies reflect and perpetuate unconscious cultural assumptions, with design, building, and evaluation of new computing devices that reflect alternative possibilities. We illustrate this approach through two design case studies.

References

  1. Agre, P. Computation and Human Experience, Cambridge University Press, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Asaro, P. M. Transforming society by transforming technology: The science and politics of participatory design. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 10, 4 (2000), pp. 257--290.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, G., Blythe, M., and Sengers, P. Making by making strange: Defamiliarization and the design of domestic technology. ACM TOCHI 12(2) June 2005, 149--173.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Blythe, M., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A., Wright, P. (eds). Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bødker, S. Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach to User Interface Design. Erlbaum, 1991.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Boeher, K., Gay, G., Sengers, P. Brooke, T., and Chen, X. Technologies for Reflection CHI 2004 workshop, Reflective HCI: Towards a Critical Technical Practice.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Boehner, K., Gay, G., & Larkin, C. Drawing Evaluation into Design for Mobile Computing: A Case Study of the Renwick Gallery's Handheld Education Project. Journal of Digital Libraries, 5(3), May 2005, 219--230.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Boehner, K., Sengers, P., Gay, G. Affective Presence in Museums: Ambient Systems for Creative Expression. Journal of Digital Creativity, 16(2), 2005, 19--89.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Boehner, K., Thom-Santelli, J., Zoss, A., Gay, G., Hall, J., and Barrett, T. Imprints of Place: Creative Expressions of the Museum Experience. Extended Abstracts of CHI 2005, ACM Press, 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Djajadiningrat. J. P., Gaver, W. W., and Fres, J. W. Interaction relabelling and extreme characters: methods for exploring aesthetic interactions. Proceedings of DIS'00, ACM Press, 2000, 66--71.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dourish, P. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunne, A. Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience & Critical Design. Art Books, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunne, A. and Raby, F. Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Birkhauser, 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehn, P. (1992). Scandinavian design: On participation and skill. In PS Adler & TA Winograd (eds.) Usability: Turning technologies into tools, 96--132. Oxford University Press NY.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher, G. Morch, A., Nakakoji, K., Redmiles, D. Designing for Reflective Practioners: Sharing and Assessing Progress by Diverse Communities. Workshop for CHI 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedman, B., Howe, D., and Felten, E. 2002. Informed Consent in the Mozilla Browser: Implementing Value Sensitive Design. Proceedings of HICSS'02 (8) 247-.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Friedman, B., Kahn, P., and Borning, A. Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems. To appear in P. Zhang & D. Galletta, eds., Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems Foundations. M. E. Sharpe, Inc.: NY.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Garfinkel, H. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall, 1967.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaver, W., Beaver, J., & Benford, S. Ambiguity as a Resource for Design. Proceedings of CHI 2003, 233--240.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaver, W. W., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. Cultural Probes. interactions, 6(1) 21--29, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaver, W, Hooker, B., and Dunne, A. The Presence Project. Royal College of Art, 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaver, W. W., & Martin, H. Alternatives: exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals. Proceedings of CHI'00, ACM Press, 2000, 209--216.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Gaver, W. W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Gellerson, H., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A., Steed, A., Villars, N. & Walker, B. The drift table: Designing for ludic engagement. In Extended Abstracts of CHI 2004. ACM Press, 2004, 885--900.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenbaum, J. & Kyng, M. Design at work. Erlbaum, 1991.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hallnas, L., & Redstrom, J. Slow Technology - Designing for Reflection. Personal & Ubiquitous Computing, 5(3) 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. 1962.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Hutchinson, H., et. al. Technology probe: inspiring design for and with families. Proceedings of CHI'03, ACM Press, 2003, 17--24]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnston, A., Amitani, S., Edmonds. E. Amplifying reflecting thinking in musical performance. Proceedings of the 5th conference on Creativity and Cognition. ACM Press, 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaye, J. 'J.' I just clicked to say I love you: Rich Evaluations of Minimal Communications. Proceedings of the Less is More Conference, Cambridge, UK. May 2005.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaye, J. 'J' & Goulding, L. Intimate Objects. Proceedings of DIS'04, ACM Press, 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Kjeldskov, J., Gibbs, M. R., Vetere, F., Howard, S., Pedell, S., Mecoles, K., Bunyan, M.. Using Cultural Probes to Explore Mediated Intimacy. Proceedings of OzCHI, 2004]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Louridas, P. & Loucopoulos, P. A Generic Model for Reflective Design. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering & Methodology, 9(2), April 2000 199--237.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. McCarthy, J., & Wright, P. Technology as Experience. MIT Press 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Muller, M. and Kuhn, S. (eds). Special Issue on Participatory Design, CACM 36:4, June, 1993.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Nardi, B (ed) Context & Consciousness: Activity Theory & Human Computer Interaction. MIT Press, 1996.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Picard, R. W. Affective Computing. MIT Press, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Schön, D. The Reflective Practioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, 1983.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Schuler, D. & Namioka, A. (eds). Participatory Design: Principles & Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., 1993.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Sengers, P., Boehner, K., Warner, S., & Jenkins, T. Evaluating Affector: Co-Intepreting What 'Works.' CHI 2005 Workshop on Innovative Approaches to Evaluating Affective Interfaces.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Sengers, P., Liesendahl, R., Magar, W., Seibert, C., Müller, B., Joachims, T., Geng, W., Martensson, P., & Hööök, K. The Enigmatics of Affect. Proceedings of DIS'02. London, England, June 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith, H., Fitzpatrick, G., and Rogers, Y. Eliciting Reactive and Reflective Feedback for a Social Communication Tool: a Multi-session Approach. Proceedings of DIS'04, ACM Press, 2004, 39--48.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Strong, R. & Gaver, W. W. Feather, Scent & Shaker: Supporting Simple Intimacy in Videos. Proceedings of CSCW'96, ACM Press, 1996, 29--30.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Suchman, L. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press, 1987.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Varela, FJ, Thompson, E, & Rosch, E. (eds) The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science & Human Experience. MIT Press, 1997.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CC '05: Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility
    August 2005
    218 pages
    ISBN:1595932038
    DOI:10.1145/1094562

    Copyright © 2005 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 20 August 2005

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader