skip to main content
10.5555/1085171.1085207guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article
Free Access

The importance of parameter mapping in electronic instrument design

Published:01 May 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we challenge the assumption that an electronic instrument consists solely of an interface and a sound generator. We emphasise the importance of the mapping between input parameters and system parameters, and claim that this can define the very essence of an instrument.

References

  1. Arfib, D. Personal Communication. (2002)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Buxton, W. There's more Interaction than Meets the Eye: Some Issues in Manual Input. In Norman, D. a. and Draper, S. W. (eds), User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 319--337. (1986).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hunt, A. Radical User Interfaces for Real-time Musical Control. DPhil thesis, University of York, UK. (1999)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hunt, A. and Wanderley, M. M. (eds.) Mapping of Control Variables to Musical Variables. Interactive Systems and Instrument Design in Music Working Group. (2000) Website: http://www.notam02.no/icma/interactivesystems/mapping.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hunt, A., and Kirk, R. Mapping Strategies for Musical Performance. In M. Wanderley and M. Battier (eds.) Trends in Gestural Control of Music. IRCAM - Centre Pompidou. (2000)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hunt, A., Wanderley, M. M., and Kirk, R. Towards a Model for Instrumental Mapping in Expert Musical Interaction. In Proc. of the 2000 International Computer Music Conference. San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association, pp. 209--211. (2000)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Garnett, G., and C. Goudeseune. Performance Factors in Control of High-Dimensional Spaces. In Proc. of the 1999 International Computer Music Conference. San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association, pp. 268--271. (1999)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Métois, E. Musical Sound Information: Musical Gestures and Embedding Systems. PhD Thesis. MIT Media Lab. (1996)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mulder, A., S. Fels, and K. Mase, Empty-Handed Gesture Analysis in Max/FTS. In Kansei. The Technology of Emotion. Proceedings of the AIMI International Workshop, A. Camurri (ed.) Genoa: Associazione di Informatica Musicale Italiana, October 3--4, pp. 87--91. (1997)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mulder, A., and Fels, S. Sound Sculpting: Manipulating Sound through Virtual Sculpting. In Proc. of the 1998 Western Computer Graphics Symposium, pp. 15--23. (1998)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. RIMM The Real-time Interactive MultiMedia project. (2001) Website: http://www.york.ac.uk/res/rimm/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rovan, J. B., Wanderley, M. M., Dubnov, S., and Depalle, P. Instrumental Gestural Mapping Strategies as Expressivity Determinants in Computer Music Performance. In Kansei, The Technology of Emotion. Proceedings of the AIMI International Workshop, A. Camurri (ed.) Genoa: Associazione di Informatica Musicale Italiana, October 3--4, pp. 68--73. (1997)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Wanderley, M. M., Schnell, N. and Rovan, J. Escher - Modeling and Performing "Composed Instruments" in Real-Time. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC'98), San Diego, CA, pp. 1080--1084. (1998)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Wanderley, M. M., and Depalle, P. Contrôle gestuel de la synthèse sonore. In H. Vinet and F. Delalande (eds.) Interfaces Homme-Machine et Creation Musicale Hermes Science Publishing, pp. 145--163. (1999)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Wanderley, M. M. (ed.) Interactive Systems and Instrument Design in Music Workgroup. (2000) Website: http://www.notan02.no/icmdinteractive systems_s/w_g.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Wanderley, M. M. Performer-Instrument Interaction. Application to Gestural Control of Sound Synthesis. PhD Thesis. University Paris VI, France. (2001)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Wanderley, M. M., ed. Mapping Strategies for Real-time Computer Music. Special Issue. Organised Sound 7(2). To appear in August 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Wessel, D. Timbre Space as a Musical Control Structure. Computer Music Journal, 3(2):45--52. (1979)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The importance of parameter mapping in electronic instrument design
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader