skip to main content
article

Socio-technical environments supporting people with cognitive disabilities using public transportation

Published:01 June 2005Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Public transportation systems are among the most ubiquitous and complex large-scale systems found in modern society. For those unable to drive such as people with cognitive disabilities, these systems are essential gateways for participation in community activities, socialization, and independence. To understand the magnitude and scope of this national problem, we highlight deficiencies identified in an international study by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council and present specific cognitive barriers identified in empirical studies of transportation systems in several U.S. cities.An interdisciplinary team of HCI researchers, urban transportation planners, commercial technologists, and assistive care specialists are now collaborating on the Mobility-for-All project to create architectures and prototypes that support those with cognitive disabilities and their caregivers. We have grounded our research and design efforts using a distributed cognition framework. We have derived requirements for our designs by analyzing “how things are” for individuals with cognitive disabilities who learn and use public transportation systems. We present a socio-technical architecture that has three components: a) a personal travel assistant that uses real-time Global Positioning Systems data from the bus fleet to deliver just-in-time prompts; b) a mobile prompting client and a prompting script configuration tool for caregivers; and c) a monitoring system that collects real-time task status from the mobile client and alerts the support community of potential problems. We then describe a phased community-centered assessment approach that begins at the design stage and continues to be integrated throughout the project.This research has broad implications for designing more human-centered transportation systems that are universally accessible for other disenfranchised communities such as the elderly or nonnative speaker. This project presents an “in-the-world” research opportunity that challenges our understanding about mobile human computer interactions with ubiquitous, context-aware computing architectures in noisy, uncontrolled environments; personalization and user modeling techniques; and the design of universally accessible interfaces for complex systems through participatory design processes.This article provides both a near-term vision and an architecture for transportation systems that are socially inclusive, technologically appealing, and easier for everyone to use.

References

  1. Ablelink Technologies. 2003. Available at www.ablelinktech.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act). 1990. Available at www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/adahom1.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. Task Force on DSM-IV. 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV-TR 4th Ed. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Arieas, E. G., Eden, H., Fischer, G., Gorman, A., and Scharff, E. 1999. Beyond access: Informed participation and empowerment. In Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (Dec.). Palo Alto, CA, 20--32. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Arieas, E. G., Eden, H., Fischer, G., Gorman, A., and Scharff, E. 2000. Transcending the individual human mind---Creating shared understanding through collaborative design. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum.-Interact. 7, 1, 84--113. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. AS (AgentSheets). 2004. Available at www.agentsheets.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. ATP (Assistive Technology Partners). 2004. Available at www.uchsc.edu/atp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Baesman, B. and Baesman, N. (Visions System). 2003. Available at www.thevisionssystem.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhatti, S., Carlson, J., Dai, H., Deng, J., Rose, J., Sheth, A., Shucker, B., Gruenwald, C., Torgerson, A., Han, R., Ramanathan, P., Govindan, R., and Sivalingam, K. 2005. MANTIS OS: An embedded multithreaded operating system for wireless micro sensor platforms. ACM/Kluwer Mobile Netw. Appl. (MONET), Special Issue on Wireless Sensor Networks. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Booth, M. 2003. Disabled woman missing. Denver Post (Feb. 25, B2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Braddock, D. 2002. Public financial support for disability at the dawn of the 21st century. In Disability at the Dawn of the 21st Century and the State of the States, D. Braddock, Ed. American Association on Mental Retardation, Washington, DC, 65--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Braddock, D., Rizzolo, M. C., Thompson, M., and Bell, R. 2005. Emerging technologies and cognitive disability. J. Spec. Educ. Tech.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruner, J. 1996. The Culture of Education. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. BVSD (Boulder Valley School District). 2004. Available at www.bvsd.k12.co.us.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Carmien, S. 2003. MAPS: Dynamic scaffolding for independence for persons with cognitive impairments. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on User Modeling (UM'03) (June) Jonestown, PA, P. Brunsilovsky, A. Corbett, and F. De Rosis, Eds. Springer, New York, NY, 408--410. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Carmien, S. 2004. MAPS: Creating socio-technical environments in support of distributed cognition for people with cognitive impairments and their caregivers. In Extended Abstracts of the 2004 Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems (May). Vienna, Austria. ACM Press, New York, NY, 1051--1052. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Carmien, S. 2004. Task support for people with cognitive impairments and their caregivers. Amer. J. Occupa. Ther. 4, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Carmien, S., De Paula, R., Gorman, A., and Kintsch, A. 2003. Increasing workplace independence for people with cognitive disabilities by leveraging distributed cognition among caregivers and clients. ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work Sanibel Island, FL. (Nov.), M. Pendergast, K. Schmidt, C. Simone, and M. Tremaine, Eds. ACM Press, New York, NY, 95--104. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Carmien, S., Fischer, F., Fischer, G., and Kollar, I. 2005. The interplay of internal and external scripts---a distributed cognition perspective. In Scripting Computer-Supported Communication of Knowledge---Cognitive, Computational, and Educational Perspectives, F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake, and I. Kollar Eds.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Carmien, S. and Gorman, A. 2003. Creating distributed support systems to enhance the quality of life for people with cognitive disabilities, In the 2nd International Workshop on Ubiquitous Computing for Pervasive Healthcare Applications (Oct.). Seattle, WA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Clever (CLever: Cognitive Levers---Helping People Help Themselves). 2003. Available at http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~l3d/clever.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Coleman (Coleman Institute for Cognitive Disabilities). 2004. Available at www.cu.edu/ColemanInstitute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Commarts (Communication Arts). 2004. Available at www.commarts-boulder.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Davies, D., Stock, S., and Wehmeyer, M. 2002. Enhancing independent task performance for individuals with mental retardation through use of a handheld self-directed visual and audio prompting system. Educ. Train. Develop. Disabil. 37, 2, 209--219.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. De Paula, R. 2004. The construction of usefulness: How users and context create meaning with a social networking system. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Dey, A., Abowd, G., and Salber, D. 2001. A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 16, 2-4, 97--166. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. DOL (US Department of Labor). 2002. Available at www.dol.gov/esa/regs/statutes/ofccp/ada.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ehn, P. 1989. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts 2nd Ed. Arbetslivscentrum, Stockholm, Sweden. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Engelbart, D. 1995. Toward augmenting the human intellect and boosting our collective IQ. Comm. ACM 38, 8, 30--33. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Epstein, J., Willis, M., Connors, C., and Johnson, D. 2001. Use of a technological prompting device to aid a student with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder to initiate and complete daily tasks: An exploratory study. J. Spec. Educ. Tech. 16, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Fischer, G. 1994. Turning breakdowns into opportunities for creativity. Knowl.-Based Syst. Special Issue on Creativity and Cognition 7, 4, 221--232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Fischer, G. 2000. Social creativity, symmetry of ignorance and meta-design. Knowl.-Based Syst. J. Special Issue on Creativity & Cognition 13, 7-8, 527--537.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Fischer, G. 2001a. Articulating the task at hand and making information relevant to it. Hum.-Comput. Interact. J. Special Issue on “Context-Aware Computing” 16, 243--256. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Fischer, G. 2001b. User modeling in human-computer interaction. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 11, 1, 65--86. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Fischer, G. 2003a. Distributed cognition: A conceptual framework for design-for-all. In Proceedings of HCI International 2003. Crete, Greece (June) C. Stephanidis, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 78--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Fischer, G. 2003b. Meta-Design: Beyond user-centered and participatory design. In Proceedings of HCI International 2003. Crete, Greece (June), C. Stephanidis, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 88--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Fischer, G., Arias, E., Carmien, S., Eden, H., Gorman, A., Konomi, S., and Sullivan, J. 2004. Supporting collaboration and distributed cognition in context-aware pervasive computing environments. In Human Computer Interaction Consortium Winter Workshop (HCIC '04) (Feb.) Winter Park, CO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Fischer, G. and Sullivan, J. 2002a. Human-centered public transportation systems for persons with cognitive disabilities---Challenges and insights for participatory design. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (June) Malmö University, Sweden, T. Binder, J. Gregory, and I. Wagner Eds. Palo Alto, CA, 194--198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Galvin, J. and Scherer, M. 1996. Evaluating, Selecting and Using Appropriate Assistive Technology. Aspen Pub. Inc., Gaitherburg, MD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Goody, J. (Ed.) 1968. Literacy in Traditional Societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Gorman, A. (LifeLine). 2003. Available at www.cs.colorado.edu/~l3d/clever/projects/lifeline.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Gorman, A., Kintsch, A., Carmien, S., Dawe, M., De Paula, R., Fischer G., and Sullivan, J. 2003. Cognitive Levers Flash Demo Available at www.cs.colorado.edu/~l3d/clever/demo/clever-demo.swf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Han, R. (MANTIS). 2003. Available at mantis.cs.colorado.edu.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., and Kirsch, D. 2001. Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. In Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millennium. J. Carroll, Ed. ACM Press, New York, NY, 75-94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Hutchins, E. 1994. Cognition in the Wild. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Imagine!Colorado (Imagine!Colorado Center) 2004. Available at www.imaginecolorado.org/home.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Intuicom (Intuicom). 2003. Available at www.intuicom.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Isaac (Isaac project). 2003. Available at www.english.certec.lth.se/Isaac.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Jacko, J. and Vitense, H. 2001. A review and reappraisal of information technologies with a conceptual framework for individuals with disabilities. Univers. Access Inform. Soc. 1, 1, 56--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Kintsch, A. and De Paula, R. 2002. A framework for the adoption of assistive technology. In Proceedings of SWAAAC 2002: Supporting Learning Through Assistive Technology (June). Park, CO. E3 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Kintsch, W. 1998. Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. L3D (Center for LifeLong Learning & Design). 2004. Available at www.cs.colorado.edu/~l3d.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Lancioni, G., O'Reilly, M., Seedhouse, P., Furniss, F., and Cunha, B. 2000. Promoting independent task performance by persons with severe developmental disabilities through a new computer-aided system. Behav. Modific. 24, 5, 700--718.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Lifeline Systems Inc (Lifeline Systems Inc.). 2004. Available at www.lifelinesys.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Lynch, K. 1960. The Image of the City. The Technology Press and Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Lynch, W. 1995. You must remember this: Assistive devices for memory impairment. J. Head Trauma Rehab. 10, 1, 94--97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Nardi, B. 1997. The use of ethnographic methods in design and evaluation. In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, M. Helander, T. Landauer, and P. Prabhu, Eds. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 361--366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Newbigging, E. and Laskey, J. 1996. Riding the bus: Teaching an adult with a brain injury to use a transit system to travel independently to and from work. Brain Injury 10, 7, 543--550.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Newell, A. and Gregor, P. 1997. Human computer interfaces for people with disabilities. In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, M. Helander, T. Landauer, and P. Prabhu, Eds. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 813--824.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Nextbus (NextBus Inc.). 2004. Available at www.nextbus.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Norman, D. 1981. Categorization of action slips. Psychol. Rev. 88, 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Norman, D. 1988. The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Norman, D. 1990. The Design of Everyday Things. Currency Doubleday, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Norman, D. 1993. Things That Make Us Smart. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Postman, N. 1985. Amusing Ourselves to Death---Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. Penguin Books, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Reason, J. 1999. Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Repenning, A. and Sullivan, J. 2003. The pragmatic Web: Agent-based multimodal Web interaction with no browser in sight. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Sept.). Zürich, Switzerland, 212--219.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Riecken, D. Ed. 2000. Comm. ACM: Special Issue on Personalization 43, 8, 26--158. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Salomon, G. Ed. 1993. Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Schön, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. Eds. 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Stern, E. and Portugali, J. 1999. Environmental cognition and decision making in urban navigation. In Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processe, R. Golledge Ed. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 99--119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Suchman, L. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Sullivan, J. (Mobility for All). 2004. Available at http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~l3d/clever/projects/mobility.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. TRB. 2001. Communicating with Persons with Disabilities in a Multimodal Transit Environment---a Synthesis of Transit Practices (TCRP Synthesis Report 37). Transportation Research Board of the National Resource Council, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Tufte, E. 1990. Envisioning Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Weiser, M. 1993. Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing. Comm. ACM 37, 7, 75--83. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Socio-technical environments supporting people with cognitive disabilities using public transportation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader