skip to main content
10.1145/1066677.1066695acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Agent technology for personalized information filtering: the PIA-system

Published:13 March 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

As today the amount of accessible information is overwhelming, the intelligent and personalized filtering of available information is a main challenge. Additionally, there is a growing need for the seamless mobile and multi-modal system usage throughout the whole day to meet the requirements of the modern society ("anytime, anywhere, anyhow"). A personal information agent that is delivering the right information at the right time by accessing, filtering and presenting information in a situation-aware matter is needed. Applying Agent-technology is promising, because the inherent capabilities of agents like autonomy, pro- and reactiveness offer an adequate approach. We developed an agent-based personal information system called PIA for collecting, filtering, and integrating information at a common point, offering access to the information by WWW, e-mail, SMS, MMS, and J2ME clients. Push and pull techniques are combined allowing the user to search explicitly for specific information on the one hand and to be informed automatically about relevant information divided in pre-, work and recreation slots on the other hand. In the core of the PIA system advanced filtering techniques are deployed through multiple filtering agent communities for content-based and collaborative filtering. Information-extracting agents are constantly gathering new relevant information from a variety of selected sources (internet, files, databases, web-services etc.). A personal agent for each user is managing the individual information provisioning, tailored to the needs of this specific user, knowing the profile, the current situation and learning from feedback.

References

  1. Brin, S.; Page, L.: The anatomy of a large-scale hyper textual (Web) search engine, Proc. 7th International World Wide Web Conference on Computer Networks, 30(1--7), pp. 107--117, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Balabanovic, M.; Yoav, S.: FAB: Content-Based Collaborative Recommendation, Communication of the ACM, Volume 40, Number 3, pp. 66--72, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Moukas, A.: Amalthaea: Information Discovery and Filtering using a Multi agent Evolving Ecosystem, Practical Application of Intelligent Agents & Multi-Agent Technology, London 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhang, B.; Seo, Y.: Personalized Web-Document Filtering Using Reinforcement Learning, Applied Artificial Intelligence, Volume 15 Number 7, pp. 665--685, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Claypool, M.; Gokhale, A.; Miranda, T.; Murnikov, P.; Netes, D.; Sartin, N.: Combining Content-Based and Collaborative Filters in an Online Newspaper, ACM SIGIR Workshop on Recommender Systems, Berkeley, CA, August 19, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Delgado, J.; Davidson, R.: Knowledge bases and user profiling in travel and hospitality recommender systems, In Proceedings of the ENTER 2002 Conference, Innsbruck, Austria, January 22--25 2002, Springer Verlag, pp. 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kuropka, D.; Serries, T.: Personal Information Agent, Informatik Jahrestagung 2001, pp. 940--946.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lieberman, H.: Letizia: An Agent That Assists Web Browsing, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, August 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lieberman, H.; Van Dyke, N,; Vivacqua, A.: Let's Browse: A Collaborative Browsing Agent, Knowledge-Based Systems, 12(8), 1999, pp. 427--431.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Sheth, B.: A Learning Approach to Personalized Information Filtering, M. S. Thesis, MIT-EECS dept, USA, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Joachims, T.; Freitag, D.; Mitchell, T.: WebWatcher: A Tour Guide for the World Wide Web, In IJCAI (1), 1997, pp. 770--777.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Winiwarter, W.: PEA - A Personal Email Assistant with Evolutionary Adaptation, International Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Thomas, C.; Fischer, G.: Using agents to improve the usability and usefulness of the world wide web. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on User Modelling, pages 5--12, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jennings, N; Wooldridge, M: Agent-oriented software engineering, Handbook of Agent Technology (ed. J. Bradshaw). AAAI/MIT Press, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sesseler, R.; Albayrak, S.: Agent-based Marketplaces for Electronic Commerce, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IC-AI 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Resnick, P.; Neophytos, J.; Suchak, M.; Bergstrom, P.; Riedl, J.: GroupLens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of net news, Proceedings ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 175--186, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Albayrak, S.; Milosevic, D.: Self Improving Coordination in Multi Agent Filtering Framework, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Intelligent Agent technology (IAT 04) and Web Intelligence (WI 04), Beijing, China, September 2004., (to appear). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Nichols, D.: Implicit Rating and Filtering, Proc. Fifth DELOS Workshop on Filtering and Collaborative Filtering, Budapest, Hungary, 10--12 November, ERCIM, pp. 31--36, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Tauritz, D.: Adaptive Information Filtering: concepts and algorithms, Ph.D. dissertation, Leiden University, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Fricke, S.; Bsufka, K.; Keiser, J.; Schmidt, T.; Sesseler, R.; Albayrak, S.: Agent-based Telematic Services and Telecom Applications, Communications of the ACM, April. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, www.fipa.org, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jing, L.; Huang, H.; Shi, H.: Improved Feature Selection Approach TFIDF in Text Mining, Proc. 1st Internat. Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Beijing, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Albayrak, S; Milosevic D.: Situation-aware Coordination in Multi Agent Filtering Framework, The 19th International Symposium on Computer and Information Sciences (ISCIS 04), Antalya, Turkey, October 2004. (to appear).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Zbigniew, M.; Fogel, D.: How to Solve It: Modern Heuristics, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SAC '05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on Applied computing
    March 2005
    1814 pages
    ISBN:1581139640
    DOI:10.1145/1066677

    Copyright © 2005 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 March 2005

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader