Abstract
This study examines virtual community quality through sociolinguistics theory. According to sociolinguistics, in oral discourse men communicate to establish superior social standing, while women communicate with the undertone of rapport, compassion, and empathy. The study shows that these differences carry over to the asynchronous written environment of virtual communities and affect men's and women's respective perceptions of community quality. Women go to virtual communities to give and to get social support and have a more favorable assessment of the capability of others. This pattern generally holds even when comparing mostly single-gender communities and mixed-gender communities. However, a closer look at these differences reveals a more complex picture, with undertones in mixed-gender communities being less than in their respective mostly single-gender communities.
- Anderson, K.J. and Leaper, C. (1998). "Meta-analyses of Gender Effects on Conversational Interruption: Who, What, When, Where, and How," Sex Roles, Vol. 39, No. 3/4, pp. 225--252.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986). "The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 6, pp. 1173--1182.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bellman, S., Lohse, G.L. and Johnson, E.J. (1999). "Predictors of Online Buying Behavior," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 42, No. 12, pp. 32--38. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Boneva, B., Kraut, R. and Frohlich, D. (2001). "Using e-Mail for Personal Relationships: The Difference Gender Makes," American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 530--549.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cameron, D. (1992). Feminism and Linguistic Theory, New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
- Cameron, D., McAlinden, F. and O'Leary, K. (1988). "Lakoff in Context: The Social and Linguistic Functions of Tag Questions," in Coates, J. and Cameron, D. (Eds.), Women in Their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex, New York: Longman Group Limited, pp. 74--93.Google Scholar
- Chidambaram, L. and Jones, B. (1993). "Impact of Communication Medium and Computer Support on Group Perceptions and Performance: A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Dispersed Meetings," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 465--491.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Coates, J. (1986). Women, Men and Languages: Studies in Language and Linguistics, London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
- Costa, P.T.J., Terracciano, A. and McCrae, R.R. (2001). "Gender Differences in Personalilty Traits Across Cultures: Robust and Surprising Findings," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 81, No. 2, pp. 322--331.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Crawford, M. (1995). Talking Difference. On Gender and Language., London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
- Davison, R.M. (1997). "An Instrument for Measuring Meeting Success," Information and Management, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 163--176. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Deeter-Schmelz, D.R. and Ramsey, R.P. (1978). "Considering Sources and Types of Social Support: A Psychometric Evaluation of the House and Wells Instrument," The Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 49--61.Google Scholar
- Edelsky, C. (1993). "Who's Got the Floor?," in Tannen, D.(Ed.), Gender and Conversational Interaction, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 189--227.Google Scholar
- Feingold, A. (1994). "Gender Differences in Personality: A Meta-analysis," Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 116, No. 3, pp. 429--456.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gefen, D. (2000a). "Gender Differences in the Perception and Adoption of E-mail and Computer-Mediated Communication Media: A Sociolinguistics Approach," in Kent, A. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia Of Library And Information Science (Volume 69), New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., pp. 139--153.Google Scholar
- Gefen, D. (2000b). "It is not Enough To Be Responsive: The Role of Cooperative Intentions in MRP II Adoption," The. DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 65--79.Google Scholar
- Gefen, D. (2003). "Tutorial Assessing Unidimensionality through LISREL: An Explanation and Example," Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 1--26.Google Scholar
- Gefen, D. and Keil, M. (1998). "The Impact of Developer Responsiveness on Perceptions of Usefulness and Ease of Use: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model," The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 29, No. 2Issue, Spring 1998, pp. 35--49. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gefen, D. and Straub, D.W. (1997). "Gender Differences in Perception and Adoption of E-mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 389--400. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hair, J.F.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hawkins, K. and Power, C.B. (1999). "Gender Differences In Questions Asked During Small Decision-Making Group Discussions," Small Group Research, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 235--256.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Herring, S.C. (1993). "Gender and Democracy in Computer Mediated Communication," Electronic Journal of Communication, ??? Vol. 3, No. 2, http://dc.smu.edu/dc/classroom/gender.txt. pp. ???Google Scholar
- Herring, S.C. (1996a). "Posting in a Different Voice: Gender and Ethics in Computer-Mediated Communication," in Ess, C. (Ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication, Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 115--145.Google Scholar
- Herring, S.C. (1996b). "Two Variants of an Electronic Message Schema," in Herring, S.C. (Ed.), Computer-Mediated Communication Linguistic, Social and Cross-cultural Perspectives, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 81--106.Google Scholar
- Herring, S.C., Johnson, D.A. and DiBenedetto, T. (1985). ""This Discussion is Going Too Far!": Male Resistance to Female Participation on the Internet," in Hall, K. and Bucholtz, M. (Eds.), Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 67--96.Google Scholar
- Hiltz, S.R. (1984). Online Communities: A Case Study of the Office of the Future, Norwood, NJ.: Ablex Publishing Corporation. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hiltz, S.R. and Wellman, B. (1997). "Asynchronous Learning Networks as a Virtual Classroom," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 40, No. 9, pp. 44--49. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values, London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
- Holmes, J. (1992). "Women's Talk in Public Contexts," Discourse and Society, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 131--150.Google ScholarCross Ref
- House, J.S. (1981). Work Stress and Social Support, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Jarvenpaa, S.L., Knoll, K. and Leidner, D.E. (1998). "Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in global Virtual Teams," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 29--64. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kilbourne, W. and Weeks, S. (1997). "A Socio-economic Perspective on Gender Bias in Technology," Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 243--260.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mulac, A., Erlandson, K.T., Farrar, W.J. and Hallett, J.S. (1998). "Uh-huh. What's That all about? Differing Interpretations of Conversational Backchannels and Questions as Source of Miscommunication Across Gender Boundaries," Communication Research, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 641--668.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Parks, M.R. and Floyd, K. (19965). "Making Friends in Cyberspace," Journal of Communications??? Vol. 461, No. 14, pp. 80--97. ???Google Scholar
- Preisler, B. (1987). "The Tentative Female," English Today, Vol. 12, No. ??? pp. 29--30.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ridings, C., Gefen, D. and Arinze, B. (2002). "Some Antecedents and Effects of Trust in Virtual Communities," Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 3-4, pp. 271--295.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Savicki, V., Lingenfelter, D. and Kelley, M. (1996). "Gender Language Style and Group Composition in Internet Discussion Groups," Journal of computer mediated communication, ??? Vol. 2, No. 3, http://jcmc.indiana.edu/ pp. ???Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1986). "Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication," Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 11, pp. 1492--1512. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization, Cambridge: The MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stewart, C.M., Shields, S.F. and Sen, N. (2001). "Diversity in On-Line Discussions: A study of Cultural and Gender Differences in Listervs," in Ess, C. and Sudweeks, F. (Eds.), Culture, Technology, Communication: Towards an Intercultural Global Village, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 161--186.Google Scholar
- Sussman, N.M. and Tyson, D.H. (2000). "Sex and Power: Gender Differences in Computer-Mediated Interactions," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 16, No. ??? pp. 381--394.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tannen, D. (1994). You Just Don't Understand Women and Men in Conversation, New York, NY: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
- Tannen, D. (1995). "The Power of Talk: Who Gets Heard and Why," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, No. 5, pp. 138--148.Google Scholar
- Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M.G. (2000). "Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 115--139. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wang, R.Y. and M., S.D. (1996). "Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 5--34. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Weatherall, A. (1998). "Re-visioning Gender and Language Research," Women and Language, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1--9.Google Scholar
- West, C. and Zimmerman, D. (1983). "Small Insults: A Study of Interruptions in Cross-Sex Conversations between Unacquainted Persons," in Thorne, B., Kramarae, H. and Henley N. (Eds.), Lauguage, Gender and Society, Rowley: Newbury House, pp. 103--118.Google Scholar
- Witmer, D.F., Colman, R.W. and Katzman, S.L. (1999). "From Paper-and-Pencil to Screen-and-Keyboard: Toward a Methodology for Survey Research on the Internet," in Jones, S. (Ed.), Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp. 145--161.Google Scholar
- Yaeger-Dror, M. (1998). "Factor Influencing the Contrast Between Men's and Women's Speech," Women and Language, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 40--46.Google Scholar
- Yates, S.J. (2001). "Gender, Language an CMC for Education," Learning and Instruction, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 21--34.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zimmerman, D. and West, C. (1975). "Sex--Roles, Interruptions and Silences in Conversation," in Thorne, B., Kramarae, H. and Henley N. (Eds.), Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance, Rowley: Newbury House, pp. 89--101.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- If you spoke as she does, sir, instead of the way you do: a sociolinguistics perspective of gender differences in virtual communities
Recommendations
The influences of participation and moderation on the development of a sense of virtual community
Sense of virtual community SOVC is an important indicator of website satisfaction and leads to higher levels of trust online and website use. More than 1,000 online users were surveyed about their activities in web forums, particularly how they view and ...
The role of an online peer-to-peer health community in addressing psychosocial concerns and social support in polycystic ovary syndrome
This article reports the findings of a study which analysed messages posted on an online forum related to the common chronic endocrine condition polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The aim of the study was to identify the health-related psychosocial ...
Intersections of gender and sexual minority status
The present study refined existing bullying literature by examining differences in risk of three types of bullying victimization (offline only, cyberbullying only, and co-occurring victimization) for four different gender-sexual minority status groups ...
Comments