skip to main content
10.1145/1062455.1062527acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Monitoring and control in scenario-based requirements analysis

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 May 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Scenarios are an effective means for eliciting, validating and documenting requirements. At the requirements level, scenarios describe sequences of interactions between the software-to-be and agents in the environment. Interactions correspond to the occurrence of an event that is controlled by one agent and monitored by another.This paper presents a technique to analyse requirements-level scenarios for unforeseen, potentially harmful, consequences. Our aim is to perform analysis early in system development, where it is highly cost-effective. The approach recognises the importance of monitoring and control issues and extends existing work on implied scenarios accordingly. These so-called input-output implied scenarios expose problematic behaviours in scenario descriptions that cannot be detected using standard implied scenarios. Validation of these implied scenarios supports requirements elaboration. We demonstrate the relevance of input-output implied scenarios using a number of examples.

References

  1. R. Alur, G.J. Holzmann, and D. Peled, "An analyzer for message sequence charts", Software Concepts and Tools, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 70(77), 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. R. Alur and M. Yannakakis, "Model checking of message sequence charts", in 10th International Conference on Concurrency Theory, 1999, LNCS 1664, pp. 114--129.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. Alur, K. Etessami, and M. Yannakakis. Inference of message sequence charts, in 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. H. Ben-Abdallah, S. Leue: MESA: Support for Scenario-Based Design of Concurrent Systems , in 4th Intl. Conf. on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G. Berry and G. Gonthier. The synchronous programming language ESTEREL: Design, semantics, implementation. Sci. of Comp. Prog., 19(2):87--152, 1992.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. R. Chatley, J. Kramer, J. Magee and S. Uchitel, Model-based Simulation of Web Applications for Usability Assessment, in ICSE Workshop on Bridging the Gaps between Software Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction, 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Feather, "Language Support for the Specification and Development of Composite Systems", ACM Trans. on Programming Languages and Systems 9(2), Apr. 87, 198--234.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Harel, D. Marelly, R. Come, Let's Play: Scenario-Based Programming Using LSCs and the Play-Engine, Springer, New York. 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Heitmeyer, R.D. Jeffords and B. G. Labaw, "Automated Consistency Checking of Requirements Specifications", ACM Trans. on Software Eng. and Methodology 5, 3, July 1996, 231--261.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. International Telecommunications Union Telecommunication Standardisation Sector, Message Sequence Charts, 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Jackson, Software Requirements & Specifications - A Lexicon of Practice, Principles and Prejudices. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley, 1995.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. van Lamsweerde and L. Willement, Inferring Declarative Requirements Specifications from Operational Scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24 (12). 1089--1114, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. van Lamsweerde, Requirements Engineering in the Year 00: A Research Perspective, 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Limerick, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. E. Letier and A. van Lamsweerde, Agent-Based Tactics for Goal-Oriented Requirements Elaboration, in 24th Intl. Conference on Software Engineering, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Leue, L. Mehrmann, M. Reza: Synthesizing ROOM Models from Message Sequence Chart Specifications, 13th IEEE Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Muscholl, D. Peled, and Z. Su, Deciding properties of message sequence charts," in Foundations of Software Sci. and Comp. Structures, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Niu, J. Atlee, N. Day, Template Semantics for Model-Based Notations, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29(10) 866--882, 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D.L. Parnas and J. Madey, "Functional Documents for Computer Systems", Science of Computer Programming, Vol. 25, 1995, 41--61.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sutcliffe A.G., Maiden N.A.M., Minocha S. & Manuel D. (1998), Supporting Scenario Based Requirements engineering, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24(12), pp 1072--1088.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Object Management Group, Unified Modelling Language, 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. S. Uchitel, J. Kramer, and J. Magee, Incremental elaboration of scenario-based specifications and behavior models using implied scenarios, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, pp 37--85, 13(1), 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Whittle, J. and Schumann, J. "Generating Statechart Designs from Scenarios" in 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. P. Zave and M. Jackson, "Four Dark Corners of Require-ments Engineering", ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 1997, 1--30.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Monitoring and control in scenario-based requirements analysis

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICSE '05: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Software engineering
      May 2005
      754 pages
      ISBN:1581139632
      DOI:10.1145/1062455

      Copyright © 2005 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 May 2005

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate276of1,856submissions,15%

      Upcoming Conference

      ICSE 2025

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader