skip to main content
10.1145/1056808.1056971acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Flexible timeline user interface using constraints

Published:02 April 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Authoring tools routinely include a timeline representation to allow the author to specify the sequence of animations and interactions. However, traditional static timelines are best suited for static, linear sequences (such MIDI sequencers) and do not lend themselves to interactive content. This forces authors to supplement their timelines with scripted actions which are not represented. Timelines also force frame-accuracy on the author, which interferes with rapid exploration of different designs. We present a redesign of the timeline in which users can specify the relative ordering and causality of events without specifying exact times or durations. This effectively enables users to "work rough" in time. We then implement a prototype and perform a user study to investigate its efficiency.

References

  1. Flash MX, software by Macromedia, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Director, software by Macromedia, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Wong, Y.Y. Rough and ready prototypes: Lessons from graphic design. In Short Talks Proceedings of CHI '92: Human Factors in Computing Systems, Monterey, CA, May 1992, pp. 83--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Mark W. Newman, James Lin, Jason I. Hong, and James A. Landay, "DENIM: An Informal Web Site Design Tool Inspired by Observations of Practice." In Human-Computer Interaction, 2003. 18(3): pp. 259--324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Drapeau, George D. Synchronization in the MAEstro multimedia authoring environment, Proc. First ACM international conference on Multimedia, 1993, 331--339. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Wolber, D. A Multiple Timeline Editor for Developing Multi-Threaded Animated Interfaces. UIST 1998, ACM Press, 117--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Borning, A., Marriott, K., Stuckey, P., and Xiao, Y.:Solving Linear Arithmetic Constraints for User Interface Applications, Proc. ACM UIST, 1997, pp.87--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gleicher, M.: A Differential Approach to Graphical Interaction, Technical Report CMU-CS-94-217, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Katsu YAMANE and Yoshihiko NAKAMURA: "Synergetic CG Choreography through Constraining and Deconstraining at Will," Proc. IEEE ICRA2002, Vol.1, pp.855--862, Washington D.C., U.S.A., May, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Premiere Pro, software by Adobe Systems, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Flexible timeline user interface using constraints

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '05: CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2005
      1358 pages
      ISBN:1595930027
      DOI:10.1145/1056808

      Copyright © 2005 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 April 2005

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader