When participants do the capturing: the role of media in diary studies

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we investigate how the choice of media for capture and access affects the diary study method. The diary study is a method of understanding participant behavior and intent in situ that minimizes the effects of observers on participants. We first situate diary studies within a framework of field studies and review related literature. We then report on three diary studies we conducted that involve photographs, audio recordings, location information and tangible artifacts. We then analyze our findings, specifically addressing the following questions: How do context information and episodic memory prompts captured by participants vary with media? In what way do different media "jog" memory? How do different media affect the diary study process? These questions are particularly important for diary studies because they can be especially useful as compared to other methods when a participant intends to do an action but does not or when actions are particularly difficult to sense. We also built and tested a tool based on participant and researcher frustrations with the method. Our contribution includes suggested modifications to traditional diary techniques that enable annotation and review of captured media; a new variation on the diary study appropriate for researchers using digital capture media; and a lightweight tool to support it, motivated by past work and findings from our studies.

References

1. J. Antin, J. L. Hall, and P. Lyman. Information filtering behavior in everyday life. In submission, 2005.
2. L. F. Barrett and D. J. Barrett. An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev., 19(2):175--185, 2001.
3. L. W. Barsalou. The content and organization of autobiographical memories. In U. N. E. Winograd, editor, Remembering reconsidered: Ecological and traditional approaches to the study of memory, pages 193--243. Cambridge University Press, 1988.
4. B. A. T. Brown, A. J. Sellen, and K. P. O'Hara. A diary study of information capture in working life. In ACM CHI '00, pages 438--445, 2000.
5. S. Carmien, R. DePaula, A. Gorman, and A. Kintsch. Increasing workplace independence for people with cognitive disabilities by leveraging distributed cognition among caregivers and clients. In GROUP '03, pages 95--104, 2003.
6. M. Clark-Ibáñez. Framing the social world with photo-elicitation interviews. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(12):1507--1527, 2004.
7. M. Colbert. A diary study of rendezvousing: implications for position-aware computing and communications for the general public. In GROUP '01, pages 15--23, 2001.
8. Cybertracker. http://www.cybertracker.co.za/.
9. M. Eldridge, M. Lamming, and M. Flynn. Does a video diary help recall? In the HCI '92, pages 257--269, 1992.
10. B. Gaver, T. Dunne, and E. Pacenti. Design: Cultural probes. interactions, 6(1):21--29, 1999.
11. R. Grinter and M. Eldridge. Wan2tlk?: everyday text messaging. In ACM CHI '03, pages 441--448, 2003.
12. T. Hemmings, A. Crabtree, T. Rodden, K. Clarke, and M. Rouncefield. Probing the probes. In Participatory Design Conference, pages 42--50, 2002.
13. H. Hutchinson, W. Mackay, B. Westerlund, B. B. Bederson, A. Druin, C. Plaisant, M. Beaudouin-Lafon, S. Conversy, H. Evans, H. Hansen, N. Roussel, and B. Eiderback. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In ACM CHI '03, pages 17--24, 2003.
14. S. Intille, C. Kukla, and X. Ma. Eliciting user preferences using image-based experience sampling and reflection. In ACM CHI '02, pages 738--739, 2002.
15. S. S. Intille, J. Rondoni, C. Kukla, I. Ancona, and L. Bao. A context-aware experience sampling tool. In ACM CHI '03, pages 972--973, 2003.
16. F. T. Juster. Conceptual and methodological issues involved in the measurement of time use. In F. T. Juster and F. P. Stafford, editors, Time, Goods, and Well-Being, pages 19--32. Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, 1985.
17. M. Lamming and M. Flynn. Forget-me-not: intimate computing in support of human memory. In Proceedings FRIEND21, 1994.
18. K. O'Hara and M. Perry. Shopping anytime anywhere. In ACM CHI '01, pages 345--346, 2001.
19. L. Palen and M. Salzman. Voice-mail diary studies for naturalistic data capture under mobile conditions. In ACM CSCW '02, pages 87--95, 2002.
20. J. Pascoe, N. Ryan, and D. Morse. Using while moving: HCI issues in fieldwork environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(3):417--437, 2000.
21. M. G. Petersen, K. H. Madsen, and A. Kjaer. The usability of everyday technology: emerging and fading opportunities. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 9(2):74--105, 2002.
22. J. Rieman. The diary study: A workplace-oriented research tool to guide laboratory efforts. In ACM INTERCHI '93, pages 321--326, 1993.
23. A. V. Sampson-Cordle. Exploring the relationship between a small rural school in Northeast Geogia and its community: an image-based study using participant-produced photographs. PhD thesis, University of Georgia, 2001.
24. J. Samuels. Breaking the ethnographer's frames: Reflections on the use of photo elicitation in understanding sri lankan monastic culture. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(12):1528--1550, 2004.
25. A. Sellen and R. Harper. Paper as an analytic resource for the design of new technologies. In ACM CHI 97, pages 319--326, 1997.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing