User-oriented graphics systems for decision support in unstructured tasks

ABSTRACT

The quality of graphic interaction languages may be examined in terms of what the user sees at each interaction point, what he has to know in order to interpret what he sees, and what actions he can take at the interaction point. These guiding questions are of special importance in designing graphic facilities to be used by managers in solving unstructured problems found in business and industry. Three principles for design respond to the guiding questions and represent a partial synopsis of what we have learned in our work. I. Design the context presented to the user at each interaction point to suggest the actions which a user can take upon that context. II. When processes are indeterminate (e.g., in unstructured problems), focus design on particular displayable data representations (e.g. tables, graphs, charts) rather than on the processes in which representations may be used. III. Design the system to have an explicit framework so that a user working out a solution to an unstructured problem can take the graphics system structure for granted as he concentrates on discovering problem structure. These principles will continue to be developed, revised, and expanded in our Decision Support Systems project.

References

1. ACM/SIGGRAPH October, 1976, Workshop on "User-oriented Design of Interactive Graphics Systems"; Information for Respondents, April, 1976.
2. Adams, Edward N. The computer in academic instruction. Research Report RC 3063, Watson Research Center (IBM), Yorktown Heights, NY, 1970, p. 18.
3. Anthony, Robert N. Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis; Appendix C, "What is a valid generalization?" Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, 1965, 157--67.
4. Bennett, John L. Spatial concepts as an organizing principle for interactive bibliographic search. In: Walker, Donald E.; (Ed.) Interactive Bibliographic Search: The User/Computer Interface. AFIPS Press, Montvale, New Jersey, 1971, 67--82.
5. Bennett, John L. "The user interface in interactive systems," Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 7, Carlos Cuadra, (Ed.), American Society for Information Science, Washington, D. C. 1972, 159--196.
6. Bennett, John L. Integrating users and decision support systems. In: Proceedings, Sixth and Seventh Annual Conferences, John D. White (Ed.), Society for Management Information Systems, Chicago, Ill., 1976, 77--86.
7. Carlson, Eric D., Bennett, J., Giddings, G., and Mantey, P. "The design and evaluation of an interactive geo-data analysis and display system," IFIP Congress 74, 1974, 1057--61.
8. Carlson, Eric D., Grace, B. F., and Sutton, J. A. "Observations on End User Requirements for Interactive Problem-Solving Systems," MIS Quarterly, in press.
9. Foley, James D. and Wallace, Victor L. The art of natural graphic man-machine conversation. Proceedings of the IEEE, 62: 4 (April 1974), 462--471.
10. Gorry, G. Anthony and Scott Morton, Michael. "A framework for management information systems," Sloan Management Review, Vol. 12, Number 1, (Fall 1971), 55--70.
11. Hansen, Wilfred J. User engineering principles for interactive systems. AFIPS Fall Joint Computer Conference. Las Vegas, Nevada, 1971. Proceedings, Vol. 39. AFIPS Press. Montvale, New Jersey, 1971, 523--532.
12. Mann, William C. Why things are so bad for the computer-naive user. National Computer Conference, AFIPS Press, Montvale, New Jersey, 1975, 785--787.
13. Martin, Thomas H. "Feature analysis of interactive retrieval systems" (report to the National Science Foundation), Institute for Communication Research, Stanford, California, 1974. NTIS PB 235 952/AS, 81--82.

• Human-centered computing