Abstract
The disparity between the code of election law and the code that comprises election equipment reflects inherent problems in the translation of social policies into computer procedures and overseeing processes.
- Bradshaw, S. Whether certain direct electronic voting systems comply with the Help America Vote Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Memorandum Opinion for the Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division, October 10, 2003; www.usdoj.gov/olc/drevotingsystems.htm.Google Scholar
- Camp, L.J. Design for trust. In Trust, Reputation, and Security: Theories and Practice. R. Falcone, Ed., Springer-Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar
- Camp, L.J. and Lewis, K. Code as speech: A discussion of Bernstein v. USDOJ, Karn v. USDOS, and Junger v. Daley in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent shift to Federalism. In Ethics and Information Technology, Volume 3, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Douglas, S. Inventing American Broadcasting 1899--1922. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1997.Google Scholar
- Lessig, L. CODE and Other Laws of Cyberspace. Basic Books, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mercuri, R. A better ballot box? IEEE Spectrum 39, 10 (Oct. 2002); www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/publicfeature/oct02/evot.html. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mitrou, L., et al. Electronic voting: Constitutional and legal requirements, and their technical implications. In Secure Electronic Voting, Dimitris A. Gritzalis, Ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar
- Roth, S.K. Disenfranchised by design: Voting systems and the election process. Information Design Journal 9, 1 (1998); www.decadeofbehavior.org/policyseminars/er_roth1998.pdf.Google Scholar
- Shelley, K. Statement of Vote, 2003 Statewide Special Election, October 7, 2003. Certified in Sacramento, CA, November 14, 2003; www.ss.ca.gov/elections/sov/2003_special/contents.htm.Google Scholar
- Spar, D. Ruling the Waves: Cycles of Discovery, Chaos, and Wealth, from the Compass to the Internet. Harcourt, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Southwest Voter Registration Education Project et al. v. Kevin Shelley and Ted Costa, No. 03-56498 D.C., No CV-03-05715-SVW; Per Curiam Opinion filed September 15, 2003, and subsequent ruling from rehearing by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, filed September 23, 2003; www.ca9.uscourts.gov.Google Scholar
- United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Memorandum Opinion in Civil Action No. 03-MS-0040 (JDB), Recording Industry Association of America v. Verizon Internet Services, April 24, 2003.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The code of elections
Recommendations
Complexity of Shift Bribery in Iterative Elections
AAMAS '18: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent SystemsIn iterative voting systems, candidates are eliminated in consecutive rounds until either a fixed number of rounds is reached or the set of remaining candidates does not change anymore. We focus on iterative voting systems based on the positional ...
The complexity of bribery in elections
AAAI'06: Proceedings of the 21st national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1We study the complexity of influencing elections through bribery: How computationally complex is it for an external actor to determine whether by a certain amount of bribing voters a specified candidate can be made the election's winner? We study this ...
Risk-Limiting Audits for Condorcet Elections
Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2023 International WorkshopsAbstractElections where electors rank the candidates (or a subset of the candidates) in order of preference allow the collection of more information about the electors’ intent. The most widely used election of this type is Instant-Runoff Voting (IRV), ...
Comments