skip to main content
10.1145/1017833.1017873acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

An engaging multimedia design model

Published:01 June 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Multimedia has enormous potential but nobody is quite sure what works and what does not for children. A preliminary scoping study has shown that children do realise the potential but do not like the design of the applications given to them. The experimental programme of the research was focused on features that engage children. A review identified five main factors: simulation interactivity, construct interactivity, immediacy, feedback and goals. The popular game 'The Sims' had these properties and was used as a vehicle for investigation. A number of experimental studies were conducted with children (9 to 14 years old). As a result a 6-component theory of engagement has been formulated as An Engaging Multimedia Design Model for children.

References

  1. Ambron, S. and K. Hooper Learning with Interactive Multimedia - Developing and Using Multimedia Tools in Education. Washington, Microsoft Press. (1990). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Barker, J. and R. N. Tucker, Eds. The Interactive Learning Revolution - Multimedia in Education and Training. London, Kogan Page. (1990). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Button, G. Ethno methodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (1991).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, L. and Manion, L. Research Methods in Education. (1st. Ed.) London: Croom Helm. (1980).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, L. and Manion, L. Research Methods in Education. (3rd. Ed.) London: Croom Helm. (1989).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dillon, A Designing Usable Electronic Text. London: Taylor & Francis. (1994). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Donker, A., & Markopoulos, P., Assessing the effectiveness of usability evaluation methods for children. Paper presented at the PC-HCI2001, Patras, Greece (2001)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Draper, S. W. Analysing fun as a candidate software requirement. Personal technology, 3(1), 1 -6 (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Druin, A., et al The Design of Children's Technology. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman. (1999). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Druin, A., Bederson, B., Boltman, A., Miura, A., Knotts-Callaghan, D., & Platt, M. (1999). Children as our technology design partners. In A. Druin (Ed.), The Design of Children's technology (pp. 51-72). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gibson, J. J The Information Available in Pictures. Leonardo, 4, 27-35 (1971).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. (1968).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gombrich, E. H. Art and Illusion. A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. (1969).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanna, E., Risden, K., Czerwinski, M., & Alexander, K., J. The Role of Usability Research in Designing Children's Computer Products. In A. Druin (Ed.), The Design of Children's Technology (pp. 4-26). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann. (1999). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hanna, L., Risden, K., & Alexander, K., J. Guidelines for usability testing with children. Interactions, 1997(5), 9-14. (1997). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lefcourt, H. M., Ed. Research with the Locus of Control Construct. London, Academic Press. (1981).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewin, K. Field Theory in Social Science-Selected Theoretical Papers. London, Tavistock Publications. (1952).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Phare, E. J. Locus of Control in Personality. New Jersey, Kansas State University, General Learning Press. (1976).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Plamer, R What is CBT Interactive Video? England, National Computing Centre (NCC) Publications. (1987).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. PreeceInteraction design: beyond human-computer interaction. New York: John Wiley &Sons (2002) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ravden, S. and Johnson, G. Evaluating Usability of Human-Computer Interfaces. Chichester: Ellis Horwood. ((1989) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Read, J. C., & MacFarlane, S. J. Measuring Fun. Paper presented at the Computers and Fun 3, York, England (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Read, J. C., MacFarlane, S. J., & Casey, C. Expectations and Endurability - Measuring Fun. Paper presented at the Computers and Fun 4, York, England (2001a).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Read, J. C., MacFarlane, S. J., & Casey, C. Measuring the Usability of Text Input Methods for Children. Paper presented at the HCI2001, Lille, France (2001b)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Read, J. C., & MacFarlane, S. J. Endurability, Engagement and Expectations: Measuring Children's Fun. In Bekker, M. M. et. al Proceedings of the international workshop 'Interaction Design and Children', August 28-29, 2002, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Read, J. C. et. al An Investigation of Participatory Design with Children - Informant, Balanced and Facilitated Design. In Bekker, M. M. et al Proceedings of the international workshop 'Interaction Design and Children', August 28-29, 2002, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (2002)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Risden, K., Hanna, E., & Kanerva, A. Dimensions of intrinsic motivation in children's favorite computer activities. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Washington, DC. Page 7 (1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (eds.) Grounded Theory in Practice. London: Sage. (1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Thomas, R. M. Human Development Theories - Windows On Culture. London, Sage Publications. (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Wood, D. How Children Think and Learn. Oxford, Basil Blackwell. (1988).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Wart Ella, E. et al Children and Interactive Media. Compendium: Markle Foundation (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Willows, D. M. & Houghton, H. A. (eds.) The Psychology of Illustration in Basic Research London: Springer Verlag (1987).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader