The promise and perils of a participatory approach to developing an open source community learning network

ABSTRACT

This paper describes and analyses the early developmental stages of a community learning network based in an urban community and social service agency. With government funding, the community organization contracted with a small software firm to design and implement participatively a web-based ‘community portal’ using open source software and techniques. While adopting these progressive development ideals has brought notable benefits, they have also posed significant challenges for the parties involved. In particular, mis-matched expectations, budget squeezes, and slipped schedules have been attributed to the approach being too participatory and too open. We examine these claims and offer insights into community-oriented, participatory, open source development projects.

References

1. Agre, P. (1998, 3 March). The Internet and Public Discourse. First Monday, 3(3). Retrieved from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue3_3/agre/index.html.
2. Benston, M. (1990). Participatory Design by non-profit groups. In Proc. of the Participatory Design Conference (pp. 107--113). Palo Alto, CA: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility.
3. Blomberg, J., Trigg, R., & Suchman, L. (1996). Reflections on a Work Oriented Design Project. Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 237--265.
4. Bodker, S., Greenbaum, J., & Kyng, M. (1991). Setting the Stage for Design as ActionJ. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), (pp. 139--154). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Clement, A., & Van den Besselaar, P. (1993, June). A Retrospective Look at PD Projects. Communications of the ACM, 36(4), 29--37.
6. Ehn, P., & Kyng, M. (1991). Cardboard Computers: Mocking-it-up or Hands-on Future J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at Work, (pp. 169--196). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Greenbaum, J., & Kyng, M. (1991). Introduction: Situated Design J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at Work, (pp. 1--24). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Gurstein, M. (2001, 21 April). Community Learning, Community Economic Development and the New Economy. Ottawa: Community Learning Networks Secretariat, Office of Learning Technologies, Human Resources Development Canada, Government of Canada.
9. Gurstein, M., ed. (2000). Community Informatics: Enabling Communities With Information And Communications Technologies. Hershey, PA; London, UK: Idea Group Publishing.
10. Hague, B. N., & Loader, B. D., eds. (1999). Digital Democracy: Discourse And Decision Making In The Information Age. Cambridge, UK; New York: Routledge.
11. Keeble, L., & Loader, B. D. (2001). Community Informatics: Themes and Issues. In L. Keeble & B. D. Loader (Eds.), Community Informatics: Shaping Computer-Mediated Social Relations (pp. 1--10). New York and London: Routledge.
12. Kensing, F., & Madsen, K. H. (1991). Generating Visions: Future Workshops and Metaphorical Design J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at Work, (pp. 155--168). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Kensing, F., & Bloomberg, J. (1998). Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7(3/4), 167--185.
14. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15. Liff, S., & Steward, F. (2001). Communities And Community E-Gateways: Networking For Social Inclusion. In L. Keeble & B. D. Loader (Eds.), Community Informatics: Shaping Computer-Mediated Social Relations (pp. 324--341). New York and London: Routledge.
16. Loader, B. D. (1998). Cyberspace Divide: Equality, Agency and Policy in the Information Society. In B. Loader (Ed.), Cyberspace Divide: Equality, Agency and Policy in the Information Society (pp. 3--16). New York and London: Routledge.
17. Luke, R. (2002). Habit@online: Web portals as purchasing ideology. Topia: A Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies, 8, 61--89.
18. McPhail, B., Constantino, T., Bruckmann, D., Barclay, R., & Clement, A. (1998). CAVEAT Exemplar: Participatory Design in a Non-Profit Volunteer Organization. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7(3/4), 223--241.
19. Merry, P. (2000). Open Source Learning: A Key to Multiculturalism, Citizenship, and the Knowledge Society. Retrieved 4 April 2001, from Engage! Interact: http://www.engage.nu/interact/DOWNLOADS/Open_Source_Learning.doc.
20. Mogensen, P. H., & Shapiro, D. (1998). When Survival is an Issue: PD in Support of Landscape Architecture. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7(3/4), 187--203.
21. Moore, A. (2002, September/October). Lens on the Future: Open-Source Learning. EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved 2 May 2004, from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0253.pdf.
22. Neice, D. (2000). Conspicuous Contributions - Signs of Social Esteem on the Internet. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sussex, Science and Technology Policy Research.
23. O'Day, V., Bobrow, D. G., & Shirley, M. (1998). Network Community Design: A Social-Technical Design Circle. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7(3/4), 315--337.
24. Suchman, L. (1995, September). Representations of work: Making work visible. Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM, 38(9), 56.
25. Suchman, L. (2002). Located Accountabilities in Technology Production. Retrieved 22 August 2002, from Department of Sociology, Lancaster University: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/soc039ls.html.
26. Trigg, R. (2000). From Sandbox to "Fundbox": Weaving participatory design into the fabric of a busy non-profit. In PDC 2000 Proc. of the Participatory Design Conference (pp. 174--183). Palo Alto, CA: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility.