skip to main content
10.1145/1007352.1007377acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Graph entropy and quantum sorting problems

Published:13 June 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Let P = (X, < P) be a partial order on a set of n elements X = x1, x2,..., xn. Define the quantum sorting problem QSORTP as: given n distinct numbers x1, x2,..., xn consistent with P, sort them by a quantum decision tree using comparisons of the form "xi: xj". Let Qε(P) be the minimum number of queries used by any quantum decision tree for solving QSORTP with error less than ε (where 0 < ε < 1/10 is fixed). It was proved by Hoyer, Neerbek and Shi (Algorithmica 34 (2002), 429--448) that, when P0 is the empty partial order, Qε(P0) ≥ Ω (n log n), i. e., the classical information lower bound holds for quantum decision trees when the input permutations are unrestricted.In this paper we show that the classical information lower bound holds, up to an additive linear term, for quantum decision trees for any partial order P. Precisely, we prove Qε(P) ≥ c log2 e(P)-c'n where c,c' > 0 are constants and e(P) is the number of linear orderings consistent with P. Our proof builds on an interesting connection between sorting and Korner's graph entropy that was first noted and developed by Kahn and Kim (JCSS 51(1995), 390--399).

References

  1. S. Aaronson. Quantum lower bounds for the collision problem. In Proc. 34th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 635--642. ACM, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Ambainis. A better lower bound for quantum algorithms searching an ordered list. In Proc. 40th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 352--357. IEEE, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Ambainis. Quantum lower bounds by quantum arguments. In Proc. 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 636--643. ACM, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. Beals, H. Buhrman, R. Cleve, M. Mosca, and R. de Wolf. Quantum lower bounds by polynomials. In Proc. 39th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 352--361. IEEE, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. Bennett, E. Bernstein, G. Brassard, and U. Vazirani. Strengths and weaknesses of quantum computation. SIAM J. on Computing, 26:1510--1523, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H. Buhrman and R. de Wolf. A lower bound for quantum search of an ordered list. Information Processing Letters, 70:205--209, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Csiszar, J. Korner, L. Lovasz, K. Marton, and G. Simonyi. Entropy splitting for antiblocking corners and perfect graphs. Combinatorica, 10:27--40, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, and M. Sipser. A limit on the speed of quantum computation for insertion into an ordered list. arXiv. org e-Print archive, quant-ph/9812057, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Fredman. How good is the information bound in sorting. Theoretical Computer Science, 1:355--361, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. P. Hoyer, J. Neerbek, and Y. Shi. Quantum complexities of ordered searching, sorting, and element distinctness. Algorithmica, 34:429--448, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. J. Kahn and J. Kim. Entropy and sorting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 51:390--399, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Kahn and N. Linial. Balancing poset extensions via Brunn-Minkowski. Combinatorica, 11:363--368, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. J. Kahn and M. Saks. Balancing poset extensions. Order, 1:113--126, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. Korner. Coding of an information source having ambiguous alphabet and the entropy of graphs. In Transactions of 6th Prague Conference on Information Theory, etc., pages 411--425. Academia, Prague, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Korner. Fredman-Komlos bounds and information theory. SIAM Journal on Alg. Disc. Meth., 7:560--570, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. I. Newman, P. Ragde, and A. Wigderson. Perfect hashing, graph entropy and circuit complexity. In Proc. 5th Annual IEEE Symposium on Structure in Complexity Theory, pages 91--100. IEEE, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. J. Radhakhrishnan. Better bounds for threshold formulas. In Proc. 32nd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 314--323. IEEE, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Y. Shi. Entropy lower bounds of quantum decision tree complexity. Information Processing Letters, 81(1):23--27, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Y. Shi. Quantum lower bounds for the collision and the element distinctness problems. In Proc. 43rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 513--519. IEEE, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. G. Simonyi. Perfect graphs and graph entropy: An updated survey. Chapter 13 in Perfect Graphs, edited by J. Ramirez-Alfonsin and B. Reed, pages 293--328. John Wiley and Sons, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. R. Stanley. Two poset polytopes. Discrete Computational Geometry, 1:9--23, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Graph entropy and quantum sorting problems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      STOC '04: Proceedings of the thirty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
      June 2004
      660 pages
      ISBN:1581138520
      DOI:10.1145/1007352

      Copyright © 2004 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 June 2004

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      STOC '24
      56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
      June 24 - 28, 2024
      Vancouver , BC , Canada

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader