skip to main content
10.1145/996350.996402acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Enhancing digital libraries with TechLens+

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 June 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

The number of research papers available is growing at a staggering rate. Researchers need tools to help them find the papers they should read among all the papers published each year. In this paper, we present and experiment with hybrid recommender algorithms that combine Collaborative Filtering and Content-based. Filtering to recommend research papers to users. Our hybrid algorithms combine the strengths of each filtering approach to address their individual weaknesses. We evaluated our algorithms through offline experiments on a database of 102, 000 research papers, and through an online experiment with 110 users. For both experiments we used a dataset created from the CiteSeer repository of computer science research papers. We developed separate English and Portuguese versions of the interface and specifically recruited American and Brazilian users to test for cross-cultural effects. Our results show that users value paper recommendations, that the hybrid algorithms can be successfully combined, that different algorithms are more suitable for recommending different kinds of papers, and that users with different levels of experience perceive recommendations differently These results can be applied to develop recommender systems for other types of digital libraries.

References

  1. ACM Digital Library, http://www.acm.org/dl, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Balabanovic, M. and Y. Shoham. Fab: Content- Based, Collaborative Recommendation. Communications of the ACM, 40(3), 1997, pp. 66--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bollacker, K., S. Lawrence, and C. L. Giles. A System for Automatic Personalized Tracking of Scientific Literature on the Web. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries (DL 99), Berkeley, CA, 1999, pp. 105--113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Breese, J., D. Heckerman, and C. Kadie. Empirical Analysis of Predictive Algorithms for Collaborative Filtering. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 98), Madison, WI, 1998, pp. 43--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Burke, R. Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments. User Modeling and User--adapted Interaction, 12(4), 2002, pp. 331--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Claypool, M., A. Gokhale, T. Miranda, P. Murnikov, D. Netes, and M. Sartin. Combining Content--Based and Collaborative Filters in an Online Newspaper. ACM SIGIR '99 Workshop on Recommender Systems, Berkeley, CA, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cotter, P. and B. Smyth. PTV: Intelligent Personalised TV Guides. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IAAI--2000), Austin, TX, 2000, pp. 957--964. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. eBizSearch, http://gunther.smeal.psu.edu/, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Google, http://www.google.com/, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Herlocker, J., J. Konstan, A. Borchers, and J. Riedl. An Algorithmic Framework for Performing Collaborative Filtering. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '99), Berkeley, CA, 1999, pp. 230--237. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Bharat, K., T. Kamba, and M. Albers. Personalized, Interactive News on the Web. Multimedia Systems, 6(5), 1998, pp. 249--358. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Karypis, G., SUGGEST Top-N Recommendation Engine, http://www.cs.umn.edu/.karypis/suggest/, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. LANL (arXiv) e-Print Archive, http://arxiv.org/, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lawrence, S., Access to Scientific literature. The Nature Yearbook of Science and Technology, 420(19), 2001, p. 86--88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. McCallum, A. K., Bow: A toolkit for statistical language modeling, text retrieval, classification and clustering, http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/mccallum/bow/, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. McNee, S., I. Albert, D. Cosley, P. Gopalkrishnan, S. K. Lam, A. M. Rashid, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. On the Recommending of Citations for Research Papers. In Proceedings of the ACM 2002 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2002), New Orleans, LA, 2002, pp. 116--125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Melville, P., R. J. Mooney, and R. Nagarajan. Content-Boosted Collaborative Filtering. ACM SIGIR 2001 Workshop on Recommender Systems, New Orleans, LA, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. NSF, N.S.F. Academic Research and Development. 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. New-Zealand Digital Library, http://www.sadl.uleth.ca/nz/cgi-bin/library, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Penn State University, CiteSeer.IST, http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Resnick, P., N. Iacovou, M. Sushak, P. Bergstrom, and J. Riedl. GroupLens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proceedings of the ACM 1994 Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW '94), Chapel Hill, NC, 1994, pp. 175--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Salton, G. and C. Buckley, Term weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 24(5), 1988, p. 513--523. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Shardanand, U. and P. Maes. Social information Filtering: Algorithms for automating "word of mouth". In Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 95), Denver, CO, 1995, pp. 210--217. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Woodruff, A., R. Gossweiler, J. Pitkow, E. H. Chi, and S. K. Card. Enhancing a Digital Book with a Reading Recommender. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2000), The Hague, The Netherlands, 2000, pp. 153--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Enhancing digital libraries with TechLens+

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                JCDL '04: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
                June 2004
                440 pages
                ISBN:1581138326
                DOI:10.1145/996350

                Copyright © 2004 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 7 June 2004

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • Article

                Acceptance Rates

                JCDL '04 Paper Acceptance Rate61of249submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader